The Granola Gap

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5921
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

The Granola Gap

Post by reinhard » Tue Jul 05, 2016 2:40 pm

I found this fascinating (and rather attractive) infographic in the New York times illustrating the "granola gap," the difference between how healthy various foods are according to scientists vs. public perception (with granola bars the discrepancy was particularly shocking). I don't think it's an accident that most of the biggest gaps were for heavily marketed product categories (diet shakes). Reminds me of "The diet bar is what separates the total scams from the mere fads." -- No S Diet, page 48.

http://nyti.ms/29jzkXY

LifeisaBlessing
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 1:08 pm

Post by LifeisaBlessing » Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:53 pm

Reinhard--Thanks for the post and article link! I was happy to see sushi's high nutrition ranking. That is definitely a family favorite! :)
I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.
~Jimmy Dean

The second you overcomplicate it is the second it becomes the thing for which it is a corrective.
~El Fug, on the NoS Diet

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:33 pm

And what was ubiquitous as offerings at restaurants when I went on my recent trip to the low Sierras (where choices were more limited, being away from the big cities)? pizza, hamburger, fries. Everything else was darn expensive. I've rarely seen good quality oatmeal offered anywhere. (If people were eating better at home, these foods could be just what they eat on special occasions.)

Problem is, people may be asking Google what's healthy, but they are still very often buying and eating what is not. If they didn't, those foods would hardly be available.

This is where dang freedom gets in the way of what might be decent public policy that somehow limits access to the egregious items.

I think it's also interesting that not many vegetables were asked about .Does this mean people know they're healthy? (But still don't eat them?)
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

Ray E
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by Ray E » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:21 pm

I like reading how former "evil foods" like whole milk and red meat are now deemed healthy by 60%+ of nutritionists, but this number would be 20% or lower if this poll were conducted 20 years ago.

Perhaps they should no longer be called nutritionists, but food faddists since this really seems to be what they be.

Dale
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:27 am

Post by Dale » Sun Jul 17, 2016 5:51 pm

It's interesting as well that the general public seem to be right in line with the nutritionists on certain foods (hamburgers, whole milk, cheddar cheese, peanut butter, bread, etc.). I'm surprised that the public don't see quinoa, kale, olive oil and cottage cheese as as healthy as the nutritionists, as most of those are "fashionably" healthy at the moment!

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 10:32 am

A lot of the public isn't fashionable! Bless us all...

It's funny how sometimes colleagues will be talking about "new" healthy foods and look at my plate, saying "Oh, that's what you've been eating." Only for 15 years. OK, quinoa not so long, and not so often in my book. Much more energy dense than grains.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Post by Merry » Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:39 pm

oolala53 wrote: It's funny how sometimes colleagues will be talking about "new" healthy foods and look at my plate, saying "Oh, that's what you've been eating." Only for 15 years.
LOL!
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation

Post Reply