Give it a year ... what do you have to lose?

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
blueskighs
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:11 am
Location: California

Give it a year ... what do you have to lose?

Post by blueskighs » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:22 pm

This has kind of been on my mind. Why are we drawn to the NO S Diet? What are our expectations? What can the No S diet really do for is if we really keep our N days GREEN?

There are not that many of us on the boards who have been struggling with weight issues for less than a year. Most of has have been dealing with food and weight for much longer than that.

Weight loss IS what we want, but the No S Diet is different and it seems to me that it has a lot more to give us along the way than JUST weight loss. I FIRMLY believe that if you give the NO S Diet one full year it will give you back more than you ever imagined, that would be weight loss and more.

That's why I say "give it a year ... what do you have to lose?"

Blueskighs
www.nosdiet.blogspot.com Where I blog daily about my No S journey

gingercake
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 5:19 am
Location: western U.S.

Post by gingercake » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:14 pm

This is the approach I'm constantly trying to remind myself to take. Just commit for a year and really settle down into it. I may have to stop weighing myself to really stick to that commitment.

User avatar
winnie96
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: New England USA

Post by winnie96 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:31 am

Gingercake --

Re giving up weighing yourself, Reinhard said on a different thread recently:

"I'd go one step beyond not counting calories and carbs -- stop counting pounds. Just focus on behavior. Moderate your eating and your (lack of) movement and you immediately, unambiguously solve two big problems. And the pounds will eventually get the message. I don't think counting any of these things is absolutely terrible in itself (just a little boring), but if they derail you from thinking about behavior, they're counterproductive."

That really struck me ... I'm only into month 3 of No-S-ing, and have been successful at losing weight. I tell myself that I am truly appreciating the benefits of living the No-S way (freedom from food phobia, perma-snacking, etc), but I had to ask myself: bottom line, am I really defining success based on the numbers on the scale?

As blueskighs says: "Weight loss IS what we want, but the No S Diet is different and it seems to me that it has a lot more to give us along the way than JUST weight loss. I FIRMLY believe that if you give the NO S Diet one full year it will give you back more than you ever imagined, that would be weight loss and more."

So thanks, Reinhard, gingercake, and blueskighs for your postings ... they are making me think quite a bit more deeply about what I'm really doing here ... it would be difficult for me to give up my daily weigh-ins and Excel spreadsheet with the rolling average YTD weight (I am a bit of a stats freak), but giving it up is exactly something that I should consider -- it's really in opposition to what No-S is all about. And having glimpsed the possibility that No-S will "give you back more than you ever imagined", in addition to weight loss, I think I need to investigate to what extent my weigh-ins are "derailing me from focusing on behavior".

Lots to think about ... another thing I appreciate about No-S is this wonderful forum ... helpful with specific tips, but also with encouraging me to step back and take a somewhat more thoughtful approach. Great thread to start, blueskighs!

kccc
Posts: 3957
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:12 am

Post by kccc » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:06 am

Blue, all I have to say is: There you go being reasonable again!

That's a joking line that my husband and I use when the other is being so sensible that you just can't argue. (Usually said in a mock tone that implies that it's somehow cheating to be THAT obviously right.)

Reminds me of when I was contemplating graduate school, and I said "It will take four or five years! I'll be at least XX years old when I finish!" To which my (too reasonable) husband replied "So how old will you be in four or five years if you don't do it?"

No-S is just like that. It may take a year (or more). But what else are you doing with this time? :)

gingercake
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 5:19 am
Location: western U.S.

Post by gingercake » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:59 am

winnie96 wrote:
... it would be difficult for me to give up my daily weigh-ins and Excel spreadsheet with the rolling average YTD weight (I am a bit of a stats freak), but giving it up is exactly something that I should consider -- it's really in opposition to what No-S is all about. And having glimpsed the possibility that No-S will "give you back more than you ever imagined", in addition to weight loss, I think I need to investigate to what extent my weigh-ins are "derailing me from focusing on behavior".
That is exactly it. I've dealt with the fear of weighing by doing it every day and trying to just be an observer of data, and having the spreadsheet. I think that might have been a good instinct at the time I started, after years of eating my way through life and pretending I wasn't gaining a size every six months it was good for me to deal in numbers and data at that time. Now, I'm in a different place and trying to recover from years and years of dieting. Funny to recover from something that's been successful (in terms of pounds lost), but I really do feel like I'm in a new phase now and need new tools.

Eating crazy and being in denial for years was not helpful. Then numbers and dieting were helpful for a long time to be in whatever the opposite of denial is. Now I just need to treat myself like the normal, reasonably emotionally and physically healthy adult I now am and stop meting my life in numbers. I think putting away the scale would be a good discipline.

User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Re: Give it a year ... what do you have to lose?

Post by Merry » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:25 am

blueskighs wrote:Weight loss IS what we want, but the No S Diet is different and it seems to me that it has a lot more to give us along the way than JUST weight loss. I FIRMLY believe that if you give the NO S Diet one full year it will give you back more than you ever imagined, that would be weight loss and more.

That's why I say "give it a year ... what do you have to lose?"

Blueskighs
All that time!! LOL! Sometimes it seems so easy to me to have that long-term perspective, and then other days I get so frustrated that the pounds aren't melting off quickly and effortlessly! We do need to keep encouraging each other to really try this over the long haul. Thanks for your post.

Merry :-)
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation

kccc
Posts: 3957
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:12 am

Post by kccc » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:01 am

gingercake wrote:Funny to recover from something that's been successful (in terms of pounds lost), but I really do feel like I'm in a new phase now and need new tools.
This phrase totally resonated with me. I was successful for decades in keeping weight off through strict monitoring. I weighed daily, and if the numbers drifted up, I went on a "deprivation diet" immediately.

It worked. At least in terms of weight control.

But that approach also screwed up my relationship with food. I couldn't eat anything high-calorie without feeling guilty. Food with a side order of guilt is not enjoyable. Food was the enemy, that I always had to guard against.

My old tools had stopped working anyway, but I like these new tools SO much better. I feel I'm finally learning to appreciate food in a healthy, moderate way... I've "made peace" with it. And that approach is spilling over into the rest of my life.

whisper2701
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:09 pm
Location: Ohio

Post by whisper2701 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:44 pm

I can relate to everyone's comments. The reason that I'm so interested in the No S Diet is the additional things it brings to my life other than losing weight. What I'm looking for is peace and contentment with food.

Yes I would like to lose some weight, but when I look back over my life what has really controlled me and driven me crazy, was not so much the weight, but how I let food control my emotions. When I felt bad because I ate something I didn't think I should, how one bite would make me feel I blew it and start a free for all. Then the extreme guilt afterwards. I just want to feel like I can handle food like a normal person and not use it as a numbing device for situations I don't want to deal with.

That is the main reason I'm doing the No S Diet. So I find it encouraging when someone says give it time. It has been a struggle because I just got started, but I can really feel I difference in how I handle food and how it handles me.

Linda

User avatar
Blithe Morning
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:56 pm
Location: South Dakota

Post by Blithe Morning » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:07 pm

What do you have to lose? LOTS!

For starters... self disgust because of "failures", frustration, food issues, food obsession, social isolation because of restricted diets, higher than average grocery bills because of buying specialized foods and mood cycling depending on the scale.

And let's not forget all the high fructose corn syrup and sodium that you will lose by limiting snacks.

Oh, and maybe some weight too.

User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5921
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Post by reinhard » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:18 pm

Blueskighs --

I certainly agree in principle -- but a year is a very tough sell to people who haven't even tried it yet. A month is a tough enough sell to people accustomed to the glossy magazine time horizon of days or "2 weeks!!!!"

Still, there's no question, months are the minimum scale on which you can reasonably expect good things from no-s -- but years are the best, that's where it really shines (it's possible decades are even better, but I haven't quite gotten there yet :-)).

KCCC, gingercake -- your observations are right on the money. Even "success" on most other diets is sort of an awful thing. You may have succeeded in locking up your appetite in a cage of iron will, but the energy and attention required to keep that cage securely locked takes a heavy toll. Your appetite stays profoundly unhappy, scheming to escape. I don't want to make light of your efforts, it's certainly impressive -- but it's not fun.

Reinhard

blueskighs
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:11 am
Location: California

Post by blueskighs » Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:00 pm

I have enjoyed everyone's responses ... thank you,

Blueskighs
www.nosdiet.blogspot.com Where I blog daily about my No S journey

User avatar
Nichole
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:37 pm
Location: PENNSYLVANIA
Contact:

Post by Nichole » Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:16 pm

I can hardly believe my yearly anni will be coming up in March (or was it April??). I haven't followed No-S to a Tee, but it has really helped me maintain my weight.

Thanks Reinhard.
"Anyone can cook." ~ Chef Gusteau, Ratatouille

howfunisthat
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:35 am
Location: New York

Post by howfunisthat » Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:24 am

As usual, I think your comments are fabulous! Besides...I WANT to eat this way the rest of my life....and thinking about this in terms of one year is a great way to focus on the future....

Thanks Blueskighs!!!

janie
Nothing worthwhile is ever easy...

Post Reply