Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:41 am
by mimi
Um, not much to report. Still losing weight, still lifting weights. Weight on the body is going down, weight on the bar is going up. Both have slowed down a bit, but still going. Looking forward to getting below 400. It's coming.
That's quite a
lot to report - great work! I know how exciting it is to move down into another weight-range bracket...good for you.
You have lots to smile and be happy about Magicman! Please don't be sad...
Mimi

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:06 pm
by magicman
Well, I'm not really sure what happened.
My friend I was lifting weights with went back to college, and in the absence of a training partner, I started going to the gym less and less.
As I started going to the gym less and less, my keeping track of metrics happened less and less. As my keeping track of metrics became less and less, I'm sure my daily calorie count became more and more.
I also seem to have wiped out what remaining lactose tolerance my body had with daily protein shakes made with milk. So suddenly I found myself avoiding milk and cheese, when both were staples of my diet, and replacing them calories that were less satiating.
So, with trepidation, my new source of motivation (which maybe I'll tell you all about later) has me getting back on the horse, and I'm back to my morning weigh in.
406.4 lbs
46.6% bf
The good news is I've developed enough good habits and/or changed my lifestyle enough that a few months without the cracking of the whip did not result in regain of weight. I actually continued to lose, albeit very very slowly.
This is a testament to No-S. When I went of my diet, I reverted back to my normal way of eating. And my normal way of eating is three plates a day, and not the excesses of my previous life.
On the other hand, I should be below 400 by now. So now I'm going to turn the fire on again. I've been telling people "I've lost 50 pounds this year" for too long. I need to turn that 50 into a 75.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:46 pm
by hilly6000
From what I read, do you eat two meals a day or three? I only assumed out of context... not sure which post lead me to this conclusion. I've been looking into two meals a day information, but haven't directly decided on it. Other than that, I've read all your posts and want you to know to keep it up! The name of the game is to maintain your losses, and it sounds like you've got it down! Hope to hear more and I agree with you about loose skin. I read that, too... that you have to lose even more for it to "snap back", albeit slowly. I face the same fear... and I'm DEATHLY afraid of surgery... I freak out at the thought. So for me, I will be having to wait a year or two just for it to look normal... but I think any natural way is better than surgery. So just believe in it... hopefully it's true!
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:54 pm
by magicman
hilly6000,
When I'm counting calories I don't keep any rules on how many meals I eat. It could be six. It could be one.
When I'm not counting calories I tend to stick to two or three.
I'm currently counting calories, and I actually just bought my first food scale.
As tedious as it is, I find I do my best when I'm keeping close watch on calories. This of course means I'm not doing vanilla OS, and I've considered all the warnings and caveats of not going vanilla that have been put forward.
But unlike Reinhardt, I can't naturally eye excess if I'm stuck to a plate. What looks reasonable to me has always turned out to be too much.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:49 pm
by hilly6000
I was simply curious. I'm trying to look into it, and wondered if you ate two meals. I used to count calories... you couldn't get me to stop lol, but I just went to too many places I couldn't figure it out, so I stopped. But regardless. Do you know the exact science as to why you have to lose more for the skin to snap back? Is it simply because the fat isn't all the way gone?
Now that I think about it, I should probably restrict this to pm. Sorry about that!
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:22 am
by magicman
Yes, pretty much the idea is the fat isn't gone.
50 pounds overweight while gaining from a "normal" weight will wear differently than 50 pounds overweight while cutting from hundreds of pounds overweight. What looks like loose skin is actually 99% fat, 1% skin. Get rid of the fat and it's like sucking the air out of a ballon.
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:30 am
by magicman
Well, I'm solidly under 400 lbs now. And I'm almost through the 390's.
390.4 lbs this morning and
44.9% bf
I've been tracking everything I eat on TheDailyPlate, which has helped me stay rigorous on calorie budgeting.
I'm thinking with a little bit of luck, I just may be able to hit 100lbs lost by January 1. I didn't make an New Year's Resolutions last years, instead doing something more like monthly resolutions (and before I ever discovered this site)... But the two most common New Year's Resolutions are to lose weight and quit smoking. I've done both. 100 lbs gone and no cigarettes since the Bush administration will make my New Year's celebration all the sweeter.
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:24 pm
by Kevin
You're a tough guy. I'm impressed.
magicman wrote:Well, I'm solidly under 400 lbs now. And I'm almost through the 390's.
390.4 lbs this morning and
44.9% bf
I've been tracking everything I eat on TheDailyPlate, which has helped me stay rigorous on calorie budgeting.
I'm thinking with a little bit of luck, I just may be able to hit 100lbs lost by January 1. I didn't make an New Year's Resolutions last years, instead doing something more like monthly resolutions (and before I ever discovered this site)... But the two most common New Year's Resolutions are to lose weight and quit smoking. I've done both. 100 lbs gone and no cigarettes since the Bush administration will make my New Year's celebration all the sweeter.
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:25 am
by Girl Next Door
Congratulations on your weight loss & quitting smoking!
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:21 pm
by Starla
Congratulations, magicman! This is so impressive, and I hope you're very proud of what you've accomplished this year.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:33 pm
by magicman
I've been pushing at the low 390s now for a week. One week ago, 390.4. Today, 391.6. With three of the days inbetween at exactly 390.4. And while my weight has been rock solid, my bf% has fluctuated wildly.
I know I'm eating a caloric deficit, so my body has no choice but to lose weight... I guess I always get confused when the body takes so long to catch up.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:52 pm
by Kevin
Yeah, I get those plateau periods, too. Then my weight will drop a pound and a half. Go figure.
magicman wrote:I've been pushing at the low 390s now for a week. One week ago, 390.4. Today, 391.6. With three of the days inbetween at exactly 390.4. And while my weight has been rock solid, my bf% has fluctuated wildly.
I know I'm eating a caloric deficit, so my body has no choice but to lose weight... I guess I always get confused when the body takes so long to catch up.
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:59 pm
by magicman
I'm wondering whether is may have something to do with sodium levels and water retention.
I always weigh in just after waking up and relieving myself of liquid waste to try to minimize fluctuations based on water retention, but maybe a good bit hasn't made it too my bladder yet because of sodium intake.
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:36 am
by magicman
Long time since I checked in here. I've had some ups and downs, but I'm currently down to 362. I've had my ups and downs but on average over time I'm still losing weight. I'm confident that over time, eventually I will get down to my target weight.
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 1:25 am
by Kevin
You're still a tough guy, and I'm still impressed. :)
magicman wrote:Long time since I checked in here. I've had some ups and downs, but I'm currently down to 362. I've had my ups and downs but on average over time I'm still losing weight. I'm confident that over time, eventually I will get down to my target weight.
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:20 am
by magicman
I've figured a lot of things out. Mainly that I'm highly insulin resistant. No sweets isn't enough for me, I really need to pretty much go low carb. I finally understand why I was always hungry, and it's because of insulin.
I've really been aided by learning to cook Sous Vide. I'm not really very good at cooking, but even I can vacuum pack a steak and put it in water. Easy yet perfect steak, chicken, pork, lamb, fish. I can't burn water, no matter how bad my mom said I am at cooking! 12 hours @ 130F steak... yum.
Getting away from eating prepacked food was a big part in getting the number going down again.
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:46 am
by Kevin
BrightAngel's book review in "Why We Get Fat" would be of interest to you.
magicman wrote:I've figured a lot of things out. Mainly that I'm highly insulin resistant. No sweets isn't enough for me, I really need to pretty much go low carb. I finally understand why I was always hungry, and it's because of insulin.
I've really been aided by learning to cook Sous Vide. I'm not really very good at cooking, but even I can vacuum pack a steak and put it in water. Easy yet perfect steak, chicken, pork, lamb, fish. I can't burn water, no matter how bad my mom said I am at cooking! 12 hours @ 130F steak... yum.
Getting away from eating prepacked food was a big part in getting the number going down again.
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:03 am
by magicman
Kevin wrote:BrightAngel's book review in "Why We Get Fat" would be of interest to you.
Oh, yes, I love Gary Taubes.
Also, a couple days ago I officially hit 100 pounds down!
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:01 pm
by TexArk
Congratulations on your success. I, too, believe that Gary Taubes is a life saver. Everyone always says that you need to find a "diet" that you can live with. It is not a diet, but a lifestyle. etc. etc. But those of us who have kept strict calorie control and suffered hunger know that it is not a lifestyle that can be sustained. And intuitive eating is a sham as far as I am concerned. It helps so much to understand the science behind our problem.
I am amazed at how quickly I settled into low carb and know I can eat this way for the rest of my life. I know you have much more weight to shed, but you no longer have a diet that you cannot live with. So, in a sense, you are already in maintenance.

That is the way I think about it anyway.
Thanks for sharing the links. I love to watch Taubes videos over and over. I am not a scientist, so the repetition helps me retain. I always told my students that they really did not understand a concept until they could teach it to someone else.
Here is a blog that I have just discovered. You may already be familiar with him--Canadian doctor who had type 2 diabetes. Be sure to read the my story link (can't remember exact name)
http://www.drjaywortman.com/blog/wordpress/
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:45 pm
by magicman
The funny thing about intuitive eating is that as long as I cut out carbs, I pretty much can eat anything I want, as much as I want.
Like last night I made a low carb pizza from scratch. Ate 3/4 of it, and I was full. Put the last piece in the fridge.
Carby pizzas I would finish and still be hungry and wanting more, even if my stomach was literally stuffed.
I definitely agree about having already fixed the problem. Even though I'm still fat, I feel like I've already dodged the bullet of Diabetes, for example. It gets nothing but better from here.
Thanks for the link, I'll take a look.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:49 pm
by Strawberry Roan
Wow, I just read your thread (trying to read them all, I love seeing all the imspirational stories). You have done great. It might be hard for you to see as it is slow on a day by day basis but when reading and seeing the outstanding results, all I can say is
Way to go!
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:11 pm
by magicman
Strawberry Roan wrote:Wow, I just read your thread (trying to read them all, I love seeing all the imspirational stories). You have done great. It might be hard for you to see as it is slow on a day by day basis but when reading and seeing the outstanding results, all I can say is
Way to go!
Thanks. I have plenty to go, but the more I learn the easier it gets.
As of yesterday, I'm 347.4, 43.0% BF. Today will be my first day back into the gym. Yay squats! (I'm not going to be able to walk all weekend.)
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:08 pm
by magicman
Morning weigh in: 335.6 (42.3% BF)
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:10 pm
by Kevin
That's significant weight loss in a month. Way to go.