Everyday Systems
Home * Discussion Home
No S Diet * Shovelglove * Urban Ranger
HabitCal
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterJoin! It's free and easy. 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Anyone tried/heard of SuperSlow?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Everyday Systems Forum Index -> Shovelglove Routines
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
oolala53



Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 7189
Location: San Diego, CA USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:18 am    Post subject: Anyone tried/heard of SuperSlow? Reply with quote

There is a theory of exercise promoted by a guy named Ken Hutchins that says that exercise moves done slowly with heavy weight ( enough to get to failure in 4-6 reps) is the most efficient in building muscle and fitness. I found it wasn't very fun but I have used it as a routine alternative to higher, faster reps on machines or with free weights. Anyone ever experiment with varying the speed of the moves with Shovelglove? BTW, the usual protocol in SS is to use a 20-second cycle-out and in, up and down, etc. and to hold for 10 seconds at failure.
_________________
Count plates, not calories. Three a day. 7 years & counting
Age 63 SBMI Jan/10-30.8 Jan/12-26.8 Mar/13-24.9 Dec/15 24.8 held steady +/- 8-lb. for two years Mar/17 22.8

There is no S better than Vanilla No S.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reinhard
Site Admin


Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 5735
Location: Cambridge, MA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually tried superslow years ago before coming up with shovelglove! I have the (extremely boring) book on my shelves.

The appeal is that it's (supposedly) tremendously efficient in terms of building muscle in a very small amount of time.

The downside (as you've experienced) is that it is literally torture. It's like you're strapping yourself to the rack. I thought "hey, I can put up with brief torture sessions if they'll get me results fast."

Well, I couldn't and they didn't. Not sure which way around.

Shovelglove was not only a million times more fun, but about as time efficient, I found (maybe more, since I never actually got any results from my superslow torture sessions).

The shovelglove movements, with their throwing and catching of the weight are almost the opposite of superslow.

It also looks like the science behind superslow is extremely controversial. Not that there's any science that I know of behind shovelglove, but where torture is involved, one wants VERY good reasons.

That being said, if you want to hedge your exercise bets and do both in alternation, it would be a highly uncorrelated way to bet.

Reinhard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ray E.



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:13 pm    Post subject: Superslow Reply with quote

I tried it too and agree with what Reinhard wrote. One other point, it's virtually impossible to get the results they advertise without having a workout partner pushing you beyond the point of exhaustion. If you workout alone, you'll stop well short of this point because it is extremely painful.

That said, if you stick with it, enjoy it and see improvement, then it beats doing nothing. JMO.

Ray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
storm fox



Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:55 pm    Post subject: meh Reply with quote

Thumbs down on SuperSlow from me. Tried it, but never liked it, and never got results. What about shovelglove, kettlebells, or crossfit?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phayze



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never tried it, but I've read about. Personally, I lack the disciple to go super-slow and I don't think it's conducive to "functional strength"/useful movement.

I prefer this: lift heavy, lift fast, go home early. Wink
_________________
1 Picture = 1,000 words
0:01s Video = 30 pictures
therefore, 0:01s Video = 30,000 words
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Y Goddodin



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 65

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You answered your own question with the "it isn't fun" bit. If something isn't fun then you wont stay at it long.... Now I'm not adverse to making myself 'hurt' in the name of fun, but physical pain + boredom simultaneously is unnecessary in the pursuit of getting fit.

If you like some of their ideas why not do a more standard HIT style workout and add a move or 2 SS style? That's what I did about 10 years ago when I tried it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Everyday Systems Forum Index -> Shovelglove Routines All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum