supportive Wansink findings

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

supportive Wansink findings

Post by oolala53 » Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:02 pm

We're a little late for the recommended resolution, according to Wansink, but maybe this will increase resolve this season. Start this week! Or maybe you've been doing it all year?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 54110.html


And here's a review, as I think this has been posted before.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/0 ... 26935.html

On the second one, I think "don't be an idiot" or decreasing "wild" S days is still appropos. I myself lost weight in fits and starts after short patterns of LESS food on the weekend, but I'm an exception. I wasn't willing to be any more moderate on weekdays; that may be the best option for others.
Last edited by oolala53 on Sun Nov 20, 2016 2:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Re: supportive Wansink findings

Post by oolala53 » Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:59 pm

accidental double post
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Post by Merry » Sat Nov 19, 2016 7:01 am

Did you read the one about people buying 9% more calories worth of food AFTER New Year's? That's really surprising--I wonder if I do that!

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 081221.htm

(and I had to snicker about the creative word "res-illusions." I've made a few of those in my time! Thankful for No-S!)
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Sat Nov 19, 2016 9:19 am

I would bet it's the people who say they're going to cut back who end up subconsciously rebelling against future deprivation so they stock up.

We can find explanations for anything, right? But the bottom line is fast between meals!
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

MaggieMae
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:53 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by MaggieMae » Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:27 pm

Great articles! I'm going to try to avoid weight gain this holiday season. That's why I came back to no s and joined the November challenge. I'm not doing so hot,unfortunately.

noni
Posts: 613
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:01 pm

Post by noni » Sat Nov 19, 2016 3:41 pm

Good articles! Love how they give credence to the No S eating. Has anyone ever read the book, "Slim by Design" by Wansink?
"Never go back for seconds. Get it all the first time." - Garfield

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Sat Nov 19, 2016 8:58 pm

I've read that and Mindless Eating. I don't think his ideas could have done for me what Reinhard's have, but I find them bolstering, and certainly more evidence-based than traditional failure-prone diet books.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Post by Merry » Sat Nov 19, 2016 9:06 pm

I also found it interesting that they said it takes about 5 months to lose the holiday pounds. That actually made me feel a bit better about it taking me almost a month to lose the weight from my recent holiday--but also made me realize, I don't want to continue that cycle to that extreme. I want to enjoy extra S days for special holidays, but maybe a vacation doesn't need to be ALL or MOSTLY holiday!

It also made me think--many years I haven't lost the holiday weight, and I'll bet that's true for many others too. Weight may "stabilize" as they said, but I'll bet it's often a "new normal." I don't want that to be my cycle any more.

And I'm realizing I can have fun and enjoy myself without always indulging. I still will I know--but maybe not as much.
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation

Post Reply