Breakfast like king, lunch like prince, dinner like pauper
Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:10 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
Breakfast like king, lunch like prince, dinner like pauper
This was in a post I read yesterday (I'm not saying it's new or orignial, only that I just saw it again).
Most people who post their meals here seem to be eating the least at breakfast.
If anyone practices this approach, what would a king's breakfast look like?
Most people who post their meals here seem to be eating the least at breakfast.
If anyone practices this approach, what would a king's breakfast look like?
Liz
Weight goal: less than I weigh now
Basic goal: doing no-S for life
Weight goal: less than I weigh now
Basic goal: doing no-S for life
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:20 pm
- Location: Long Island, NY
I don't know if I "breakfast like a king", but I do tend to feel better if I eat more in the morning and less at dinner. I can't make it through the morning on just cereal or oatmeal. A big breakfast for me (and my usual breakfast) is "egg in a nest", orange juice and tea. I make sure I put lots of butter on the bread (read sourdough) and whole milk in my tea. No lowfat for this girl.
(I realize that might not sound like a lot of food to some people, so YMMV.)
(I realize that might not sound like a lot of food to some people, so YMMV.)
~ Laura ~
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:20 pm
- Location: Long Island, NY
I can't even imagine how bad I'd feel. I'd end up eating like a king for breakfast, lunch and supper. When I'm at hotels with great continental breakfasts and I know I won't be able to eat for quite a while... and I want to get my money's worth, I eat WAY too much and the trend continues for the day.
I guess this doesn't work unless you actually do it.
Please pray for me
Please pray for me
Eating breakfast like a king might have made a lot more sense when folks worked hard physically in the fields and so on -- though breakfast was probably not first thing in the morning, but later in the morning. Personally, I think small to medium meals are probably best all day. We're just not that active!
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:16 am
- Location: Western Washington State
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:39 pm
- Location: United States
I read that comment in the context of how eating less makes you feel more energetic. it seemed a bit contrary to me.
I don't like a huge breakfast - a big meal makes me feel sleepy. I eat a big breakfast and I want to go back to bed - not go out and tackle my day!
I eat a small breakfast about 7.30, a good sized lunch around noon or 2 pm (depending on my schedule), and a slightly larger dinner about 6.30-7 pm.
To me, what works for me is what works - not what some saying recommends.
I don't like a huge breakfast - a big meal makes me feel sleepy. I eat a big breakfast and I want to go back to bed - not go out and tackle my day!
I eat a small breakfast about 7.30, a good sized lunch around noon or 2 pm (depending on my schedule), and a slightly larger dinner about 6.30-7 pm.
To me, what works for me is what works - not what some saying recommends.
Russian variation of the saying...
The Russian variation of the saying is:
Eat your whole breakfast, share your lunch with a friend, and give your dinner to an enemy. I think walkerlori's approach sounds great for people who thrive by eating a heavier breakfast. Some people seem to do well with this approach, others do well on the opposite approach, and yet others seem to do best with 3 equal meals. That said, I need to get back on the wagon...
Eat your whole breakfast, share your lunch with a friend, and give your dinner to an enemy. I think walkerlori's approach sounds great for people who thrive by eating a heavier breakfast. Some people seem to do well with this approach, others do well on the opposite approach, and yet others seem to do best with 3 equal meals. That said, I need to get back on the wagon...
I'm not generally a breakfast eater, but I do eat it on occasion. Something I've noticed is that the smaller my breakfast is, the more moderate my eating the rest of the day. The larger the breakfast, the more I want to eat throughout the day. I'm much more likely to have the desire to snack, even the "need" to snack, on a day I've eaten a "good" breakfast than on the days I don't or it's something very light.
Yesterday I saw two articles about breakfast being the most important meal of the day. I know I've written here about that not being the case in much of the rest of the world. In many places it's the least important meal -- just a little something to "break the fast." That makes sense to me since the first meal after fasting is usually something light.
Yesterday I saw two articles about breakfast being the most important meal of the day. I know I've written here about that not being the case in much of the rest of the world. In many places it's the least important meal -- just a little something to "break the fast." That makes sense to me since the first meal after fasting is usually something light.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."