
because....
A name is just a box we put ideas in.
Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating
osoniye wrote: What was your average carb intake before starting this low carb adventure?
I think your statement is correct,TexArk wrote:It seems to me that the main cause of kidney damage
is high blood sugar not protein,
and excessive protein seems to be a problem only
after there is kidney disease especially in the diabetic patient.
Does a Low Carb Diet Cause Kidney Damage?
The belief that high protein diets cause kidney damage is one reason why, for many years,
doctors warned people with diabetes that low carb diets would kill their kidneys.
Fortunately, this turns out not to be true.
While almost any intake of protein is a problem for people with advanced kidney disease,
studies have found repeatedly that for people with normal kidney function
or early diabetic changes the low carb diet not only doesn't promote kidney damage,
it also reduces blood pressure, which is a major cause of kidney damage
and may actually reverse early kidney changes.
In fact, people who are able to normalize their blood sugars with a low carb diet
often report that their kidney function recovers
and that microalbumin disappears from their urine.
A low-carbohydrate diet may prevent end-stage renal failure in type 2 diabetes.
A case report. Jorgen Vesti Nielsen et al. .Nutr Metab . 2006; 3: 23.
One possible reason this may happen is because a low carb diet
is really a high fat diet, not a high protein diet.
While protein might make up a larger percentage of intake on a low carb diet,
the actual amount of protein eaten is usually not all that different
from that found in a low fat diet.
Think of it this way. If I eat a hamburger with no bun and no fries and a salad
and you eat a hamburger, bun, and fries,
my protein intake may be 50% of the calories I ingest,
making it look like I'm eating a "high protein" diet.
You are eating the same amount of protein,
but the intake of all those high calorie carbohydrates makes your protein intake
a much smaller percentage of your total calorie intake,
so a nutritionist will consider this a safer, "lower protein" intake.
Meanwhile, someone eating a high carb diet has to contend with all the glucose
from those carbohydrates that are routed through the kidneys,
while the person eating the hamburger and salad will not
because their blood sugar will not rise out of a normal range.
If you are really concerned about possible problems with a high protein diet
and your kidneys, there is a simple solution.
Don't EAT a high protein diet.
Eat a low carbohydrate diet with just enough protein
to provide enough to repair your muscles and organs
and provide the glucose needed to run your brain.
Use the Protein Calculator you'll find here to determine
your exact protein need while eating a low carb diet.
A review of research evidence on the topic of whether low protein diets
actually help people with diabetes preserve kidney function published in
Sept of 2008 comes up with the suggestion that they do not,
and suggests that ACE inhibitors and ARBs are as effective
Member of Another Forum wrote:I'm not a nutritionist or a biochemist, but I am a chemical engineer by degree
and I've done plenty of mass/energy balances in my life.
The deficit does matter,
but most people seem to think the equation should be:
change in fat storage = calories eaten - calories used by body.
It is probably a lot more complicated than that, more like:
change in fat = calories eaten + calories released from fat storage
+ calories pulled from protein matter in the body - calories expended by cells
- calories added to fat storage - calories added to protein matter in body
and I'm sure I'm leaving some things out.
We don't have a lot of control over most of those things
on the right side of the equation,
even though we'd like to think so.
They're driven by genetics and hormones
and regulatory systems in our bodies,
which even biochemists and nutritionists don't fully understand,
probably because it can differ so widely from person to person.
The one thing I can control
is what kind of substances I put into my mouth.
For me, keeping carbs low seems to help
with several of those pieces of the equation,
so I know I'll have to continue with this way of life,
if I want to lose to a reasonable weight and maintain it.
****
(July 2010) Start: 296 lbs
(January 2011) Current: 248 lbs
Goal 175 lbs
Second Member of another Forum wrote:Yes, Yes, Yes.
Very True.
**
Start 236 lbs
Current 128 lbs
Guy 1 wrote:Some people do seem to have success
at losing and maintaining weight
by following a low-carb high-fat diet.
It doesn’t work for me,
but I don’t deny that it seems to work for some people.
Guy 2 wrote:I, too, had difficulty losing weight after my initial (couple) induction weeks,
as despite my vigilance in keeping my carbs around 20g/day,
I had weeks of “zero†weight loss, causing me tremendous frustration.
I still greatly admire and respect Taubes’ books and lectures,
especially his review – and debunking – of the calories-in/out theory.
Yet despite this, trying to lose weight has been hell.
However, rather than “throwing the baby out with the bathwaterâ€,
I feel that, for myself, I have to also include calorie reduction,
as it has helped me to lose weight.
Guy 1 wrote:If you look at the fine print at the Atkins site (I have links for reference)
They say if you are not losing weight cut back on protein.
If you are still not losing weight cut back on fat.
If you are still not losing weight cut back on calories to about 1800 per day.
Voila. You’re back to where you started from – counting calories.
Guy 2 wrote:I know.
In “The New Atkins†book by Westman, on page 107, he writes,
“Although you don’t have to count calories on Atkins,
if you’re overdoing the protein and fat, you may be taking in too many calories.â€
He does explain this more but it still is paradoxical.
Even Atkins talked about weight stalls and going for a week
doing 1,000 calories on macadamia nuts & cream cheese.
I think Taubes’ book was designed
to relate the basic mechanisms that make us fat (and how to get rid of it),
but for you and me, we have to look at calories as well. Not fair!
Guy 1 wrote:The basic Japanese diet is very very high carbohydrate…
[but] the obesity rate in Japan is about 3%.
Guy 2 wrote:I remember hearing a recent interview where Taubes acknowledges the paradox,
although mentioned that the lack of sugar may have something to do with it.
I don’t know what’s true,
but certainly one cannot discount the malevolent influence of sugar,
HFCS, and all that crap
Guy 1 wrote:Exercise is good because
(a) it helps you expend more calories;
(b) certain kinds of exercise can help build muscle mass,
which results in an overall higher metabolism.
Guy 2 wrote:I only know my own experience with exercise.
It helps me feel good, it stretches my muscles, helps my lower back,
but I don’t lose a drop of weight.
That’s my reality (I don’t like it, but it is what it is).
Guy 1 wrote:There is nothing wrong with eating less during the day
and saving your calories to eat more in the evening.
Guy 2 wrote:Again, I only know my own experience.
If I eat a large meal at night, it makes me “conk outâ€,
resulting in an insatiable “sweet tooth.â€
Night time is worse for me because I am usually sedentary,
contrasted with daytime where I can be “out and about†more.
Guy 1 wrote:Some people are somehow able to lose weight
by just eating certain kinds of food
and forcing themselves to stop eating when they are “almost full.â€
This does not work for me.
My sense of fullness is too out-of-kilter to make such a system work.
Guy 2 wrote:Well written.
I have no “graduating†sense of fullness.
I notice I am full way too late to be useful.
Guy 1 wrote:All diets are diets.
It drives me crazy when proponents of this or that diet
claim it’s not really a diet it’s a “way of life.â€
Guy 2 wrote:Yup.
Whether it’s a diet, calorie restriction, a “lifestyle changeâ€,
the bottom line is that you can’t eat what you want,
especially if you love bread, potatoes, pasta, and sweets (like me).
TexArk wrote:I still have my 3 meals, no snacks or sweets,
but I have not been using S Days for sweets
because I just do not need them.
So much more peaceful.
...my husband ...was excited to report the results
of his one week low carb experiment (no wheat or sugar)
and he has stopped his ultra low fat obsession.
His sinus and congestion problem is completely absent for now.
He said he thinks he must have a mild wheat allergy.
He also reported that he was very calm
and not agitated craving his usual evening snacks.
I never could get him to try NoS because he didn't want to give up snacking
--lots of toast with fake butter spray and frozen individual pizzas!
His family has a history of diabetes
and he has put on tummy weight for the first time in his life.
Taubes' book really got his attention.
connorcream wrote:Magic Bullet
What is your favorite use of it?
member of another forum wrote:I recently rediscovered a few things:
(1) Eating too high a proportion of carbs
makes me really, ready-to-eat-the-wallpaper hungry.
I received a gift of fruit and discovered that an apple or a pear
is a really bad snack for me.
(2) I need to eat some fat to feel satiated.
I've had stretches of several days in the last three weeks
when I ended up doing mini-binges (yes, plural)
because I was so darn hungry.
I should have noticed sooner that I was eating way too little fat.
During the week before Christmas and New Year's,
I decided to use a few fast food coupons.
I used to eat quite a bit of carefully chosen fast food
early in my new lifestyle but have phased out most of it.
During the week of eating more fast food,
I was surprised to find that, despite the fact that my meals had lower volume,
they were keeping me satisfied until the next meal.
It was a good booster shot reminder.
I don't know if I'll make it a point to eat more fast food,
but I will make it a point to eat more fat.
(3) Sadly, perhaps, I still like the feeling
of being noticeably full (but not stuffed).
However, if I can avoid the hunger pangs,
I am not tempted to eat until I reach this point.
(4) I seem to be OK with chocolate in the refrigerator
in small, individually wrapped portions.
Chocolate in large bars or other snack-type foods
in large containers seem to be more problematic.
One or two small pieces of chocolate
seem to be good for me for scratching the itch,
without triggering a physical craving.
Between being less busy and struggling with hunger pangs,
I've eaten more than planned,
but it hasn't been ridiculous, and I still plan to pay it back.
Now that I've reminded myself how to keep the hunger under control
and I'll be busier again, I think it will be much easier to stay on plan.
One food I think I'll be eating more is cheese balls/logs.
I found today that 4 oz of cheese log and a pear (550 calories)
made a very nice lunch--I was a little hungry five hours later,
but not the kind of hunger that Must Be Obeyed.
Sometimes I feel like a chemistry experiment!
**
Start 260 lbs
Current 144 lbx
Height 5’5â€
TexArk wrote:Today I weighed in at 170 lbs.
NoS has helped me form some habits and I no longer snack.
I gave up sweets during the week and I don't eat seconds.
I have lost 30 lbs. since adding Calorie Counting to NoS
and have counted carbs since January 1.
Since limiting carbs I feel so much better and have no cravings.
As I have said before, the counting is so easy
with software programs and nutrition labels.
Absolutely no exercise (in a wheelchair) and I am still losing!
TexArk wrote:I know that we are not alone.
When I read all the posts from those who never get S Days under control
and seem to have huge bingefests each weekend,
I suspect that is more than lack of self control.
I am more sure of that after reading again the effects of insulin.
I kept perfect 21 day N Days and had lousy S Days for 2 years...gaining as I went.
The calorie counting helped with the control, but it was mostly because
the carbs had to be less even on the weekend.
I used to be like the men in the starvation experiment.
I would think all week long what I could eat on the weekend
and I read cookbooks all week long.
I told a friend I felt like I was reading food porn all week!
NoS was not supposed to be about deprivation because of the S Days.
It just didn't work that way for me.
I am sure there are others who are lurking and reading
and can use your information when the time comes for them.
Graham wrote:Now, are there such things as low-carb treats?
What are they?
If I normally have pancakes on Saturday, are there low carb things to equal them in appeal and pleasure?
Or should I let carbs be my treats?
If sugar is bad for me, and sweeteners raise insulin too,
what can I do about my sweet tooth if I want to get slim?
Being sugar free seems so SAD.
BrightAngel wrote: I agree with you about how sad this seems.
Personally, I choose not to go that route,
and I find that artificial sweeteners fill the bill for me.
Sure, they aren't as good for one as going totally without,
but considering the alternatives, it's a vice I can live with.
Many low-carb people appear to be able to have artificial sweetners without any problem.
It is my understanding that splenda is one of these which DOESN"T raise insulin...
(low-carb people who oppose it think any "sweet" taste is bad for one)
Anyway, I always use liquid splenda in my tea,
(a powdered pkg counts as a carb because of the binders)
and I allow myself occasional treats made with splenda...
and even some with sugar-alcohol.
The majority of low-carb people seem to do the same.
I have a favorite pancake replacement that I'm using on low-carb.,
I use a very small amount of bottled sugar-free maple flavored syrup with it,
but it is good with just a pkg or two of Splenda sprinkled over it.
Here's the recipe.
Mock Pancakes
1 whole egg,
2 egg whites,
1 TB cream cheese
1/2 tsp vanilla
1/2 tsp cinnamon
1 pkt splenda
Blend all ingredients thoroughly.
Spray non-stick coating on small skillet
heat on medium high heat.
Pour mixture into heated small skillet
Then cook like pancakes - except
lift the edges to allow the batter to flow under
like one does with an omlet.
When the bottom is browned and the top is almost set,
Spray non-stick coating on top of pancake,
turn it over and brown.
I used to do this recipe when I was doing low-fat,
but then I used 1 TB ricotta cheese, and no butter.
However, on low-carb, I put butter on it, and then a couple of tablespoons
of sugar-free syrup.
I've been using this recipe for quite some time,
and it is one of my favorite go-to breakfasts.
It tastes good, and makes my body feel good.
In fact, I feel really abused if I ever have to have real pancakes.
Even my husband, who doesn't eat "diet" foods loves it.
Try this and see if it helps out.
Many of us have preconceived expectations
when we start this journey
as to how long it will take.
We think that by doing everything to a T,
everything will go as planned.
But many times that is not the case.
We must learn to accept the obstacles
that are inevitable in this journey,
knowing that the end is not what makes us who we are
or who we were meant to be.
It is the journey of overcoming obstacles
that defines who we are and who we are meant to be.
Giving up is not an option.
Member of Another Forum wrote:I had an insight last week.
I came home from town and ate some chocolate chip cookies,
then opened up a loaf of bread and ate several slices with butter.
That was one of my old habits before I lost weight.
I'm about 50 lbs lighter now,
but after eating those cookies and that bread,
I felt as fat and sluggish as I used to feel.
I thought I had so much more energy on account of losing weight,
but then I realized it wasn't just that I'd lost weight,
I had more energy because I was eating better.
That was a turning point for me and I've been back on track
(and feeling much more energetic) ever since.
***
Start: 189 lbs
Current 137 lbs
Height 5’6"
There are many No S members who agree with the above-quoted statement.gettheweightoff wrote:I just threw out the last of my diet books and it felt great.
I could have given them away but to me they are sort of evil
and why put anyone else through the nonsense.
No-S is for me... why read anything else!
Graham wrote:...if I need to reduce/eliminate bread,
what will give the texture of bread or other stodge that is low-carb?
What gives a bread experience without the downside?
ChubbyBaby wrote:In your case you may find that simply reducing your refined carbohydrates
will be enough to control your hunger.
You can try switching to higher fiber breads and unprocessed grains as well
and keeping your foods as unrefined as possible.
Another suggestion would be to read Protein Power by Dr. Michael Eades.
...he has a great blog.
connorcream wrote:I think the term low carb is not even well defined.Graham wrote: I was wondering, CC,
do you stick to No S now or just low carb
or is it low carb plus calorie counting or what?
Some sources say 25 gms, some 72, others a range 50-100,
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/how-to-s ... blueprint/.
I find it helpful to think reduced carb
because I have found with tracking that <100 carb I lose. >120 I gain.
I do not like posting calorie counts because the low calorie police show up.
But the truth, is if I ate what the calorie calculators say I can,
then I would get fat again.
I definetely am having way to much fun being trim to get fat again.
I also think calories matter
and it is no more difficult to monitor my calories along side my carbs.
I have an easy time staying low if my calories are high quality, nutritious,
satisfying most of the time.
When I track my money with DH: we balance the checkbook,
look over investments, save for retirement, plan our giving, etc...
It is not just one thing.
When I think of my family: I study their health, know their interests & friends,
send them emails about those things, go to doctors, etc...
The things that matter, and my health matters a lot,
like these other important interests, have many facets to it.
So yes calories count,
a lot of low carbers stall because of their high consumption of cheese and nuts!
However, equally as important, is where those calories come from.
I preplan for major splurges, jsut like money.
If a big withdrawl is coming soon, I save up for it.
DH & I are taking a cruise for 30th anniversary this summer.
Paying cash for it, no debt, saving. It is just a way of life.
So find your happy foods, take them apart,
decide what parts you like, then make it for yourself.
You can do this.
It is not beyond you or anyone else for that matter.
With something as important as our health,
we really should not leave it to someone else.
Member of a Low-Carb forum wrote:
My understanding of why we lose weight comes from these Taubes conclusions...
Fattening and obesity are caused by an imbalance
—a disequilibrium—in the hormonal regulation of adipose tissue and fat metabolism.
Fat synthesis and storage exceed the mobilization of fat
from the adipose tissue and its subsequent oxidation.
We become leaner when the hormonal regulation of fat tissue
reverses this balance.
Eating in a way that allows our hormones to regulate properly
is the how the weight loss happens.
The above-quote is a good description of binge behavior.Anoulie wrote:I plan on making the most out of my S days tomorrow.
Even if that means I'll be shoveling plain sugar into my mouth
and eating until I vomit.
Although I have dealt with bingeing all of my life,glimmergrrl wrote: ED is a demon I have fought all my life
BrightAngel wrote:Today, my only sister's dear husband is still in the hospital
and is having yet another emergency surgery on his spine...
...this will be the 7th lengthy surgery within the past month,
the last 4 of which have been due to complications of his first surgeries for back-repair.
This is a life-threatening problem, and
I ask any of those who Pray to join me in praying for him,
and for my sister and their children.
The concept of multitasking is a marketing ploy
to make the fact that you’re too damn busy
sound like a good thing.
Extreme obesity is defined as having a body-mass index (BMI) of 40 or greater.
BMI is a statistical measure of whether a person is normal, overweight or obese
based on whether weight and height are in proportion
To be nobody but yourself
--in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you everybody else—
means to fight the hardest battle
which any human being can fight;
and never stop fighting.
...........................EE Cummings, poet
TexArk wrote:I thought you might want to add this to your file if you have not run across it already.
It is an analogy explaining the First Law of Thermodynamics
as it applies to calories in/calories out using a broken toilet.
http://sparkofreason.blogspot.com/2011/ ... ilets.html
BrightAngel wrote:![]()
...
My new website, DietHobby.com is now up.
...
Thanks TexArk,TexArk wrote:I did visit your site and left 2 comments on the online friends post.
After your pm I checked it again and I can read my comments
so I am not sure what you are seeing.
It looks like it is going to be fun.
connorcream wrote:I think I posted in the book section as my comments were relevant to that sectioons.
I will go back and look for imaginary friends, I want to join that area as well.
It will be later today.
Thanks connorcream.connorcream wrote:Mock Pancakes These were delicious and very satisfying,
more so than the oatmeal ones, I am shocked to say.
Thank you for the recipe. I reposted it below for other people.
That is a great idea. I searched for some time trying to find a Youtube video on this recipe type. I made a similar recipe using ricotta cheese instead of cream cheese two weeks ago. I used the large griddle that DH used for the family batches as it was hot and greased. Though the taste was fine with these mock pancakes, the texture would have been better described as crepes.BrightAngel wrote:my son's plan is to film a YouTube video of me cooking them.
Thanks connorcream,connorcream wrote:Keep those good ideas rolling:-)
Thanks TexArk,TexArk wrote:Dr. Jay, --- his blog.
Be sure and check out the my story section.
He is a doctor in Canada who had type 2 diabetes himself,
put himself on a low carb diet,
works with a native peoples who have diabetes epidemic
and tried to get funding to do research, made a documentary, etc.
http://www.drjaywortman.com/blog/wordpress/
Eileen7316 wrote:Bright Angel:
I signed up for your website to leave you a comment, but I have not been validated yet!
Anyway, I watched your oatmeal pancake video. You are a natural! You seem very at ease and you have a lovely voice. I may even try those pancakes!
Good luck with your endeavor!
It certainly is.Eileen7316 wrote:Ain't that the truth!
KCCC,KCCC wrote:BA,
In respone to your request for comments,
I posted a quite lengthy review of No-S on your site.
The formatting is not quite what I expected (all my paragraph spacing lost),
but I hope it makes sense.
I will probably not spend much time on your site
(life is just too full for me, and I hang out online too much already),
but I wish you luck with it!
Cheers,
KCCC
KCCC wrote:BA - an excellent review of WWGF that I thought you'd be interested in.
http://summertomato.com/book-review-why ... ry-taubes/