Mindless Eating

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5957
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Mindless Eating

Post by reinhard » Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:03 pm

Interesting article in the new york times "Seduced by Snacks? No, Not You"

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/dinin ... ei=5087%0A

(registration required)

The focus is on snack size (not such a huge issue for non-snackers like us). But that's helpful confirmation that we're on track, and there are some other helpful bits.

Some quotes:
Dr. Wansink, who holds a doctorate in marketing from Stanford University and directs the Cornell University Food and Brand Lab, probably knows more about why we put things in our mouths than anybody else. His experiments examine the cues that make us eat the way we do.
To his mind, the 65 percent of Americans who are overweight or obese got that way, in part, because they didn’t realize how much they were eating.
I love it when scientists back up my hunches. One of the things I've alway especially touted about No-s is that it restores the obviousness of excess.
Although people think they make 15 food decisions a day on average, his research shows the number is well over 200.
By reducing input opportunities, no-s reduces drastically reduces the number of food decisions. You'll make better decisions when there are less of them and you can afford to pay more attention to each one.
Dr. Wansink is particularly proud of his bottomless soup bowl, which he and some undergraduates devised with insulated tubing, plastic dinnerware and a pot of hot tomato soup rigged to keep the bowl about half full. The idea was to test which would make people stop eating: visual cues, or a feeling of fullness.

People using normal soup bowls ate about nine ounces. The typical bottomless soup bowl diner ate 15 ounces. Some of those ate more than a quart, and didn’t stop until the 20-minute experiment was over. When asked to estimate how many calories they had consumed, both groups thought they had eaten about the same amount, and 113 fewer calories on average than they actually had.
No-s uses the power of visual cues. An empty plate sends a powerful signal that you're done.
“Will being more mindful about how we eat make everyone 100 pounds lighter next year?” he said. “No, but it might make them 10 pounds lighter.”
He's got a book coming out called mindless eating which sounds very sensible.

Reinhard

ThomsonsPier
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:18 pm
Location: Reading, UK

Post by ThomsonsPier » Fri Oct 13, 2006 3:18 pm

This is very interesting.

The bottomless soup bowl sounds hi-larious. I'm gonna go get me one for my next dinner party <evil cackle/>.
ThomsonsPier

It's a trick. Get an axe.

pangelsue
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Post by pangelsue » Sat Oct 14, 2006 4:38 am

Very interesting. I've noticed that if I put my breakfast on a saucer instead of a plate, it feels like I have eaten much more. And I have also noticed that I eat less soup when it is in a deep bowl than a flat saucer type bowl. The flat bowl seems to hold less even though when I measured it is about the same. Thanks for the tips.
A lot of growing up happens between "it fell" and "I dropped it."

Benjumanji
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:44 am
Location: Maine, USA

Post by Benjumanji » Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:03 pm

I met this guy when he was at U of I in Urbana, IL. He has a wonderful nutty sense of humor. I look forward to his book.
Carol

"If not now, when?"

Post Reply