Pictures of Portion size differences - less vs. more

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
User avatar
BrightAngel
Posts: 2093
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Central California
Contact:

Pictures of Portion size differences - less vs. more

Post by BrightAngel » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:28 pm

I liked the way this article helps one visualize
the actual way that the amount of food on a plate
differs between food choices.


http://www.dailyspark.com/blog.asp?post ... _look_like

This is a good example of what I've been talking about
when I say it is necessary for many people,
....especially smaller, older women...
to limit the types and amounts
of food they choose to put on their plate.

Some additional Portion Control is necessary
for many women to lose-weight or even maintain their weight.
The No S diet has good basic rules,
but it isn't MAGIC.
BrightAngel - (Dr. Collins)
See: DietHobby. com

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:55 pm

That reminds me of Dr. Shapiro's Picture Perfect Weigh Loss. Take a look at the demonstrations and publications.
Last edited by wosnes on Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

connorcream
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by connorcream » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:52 pm

Sticker shock was one of my intial reactions to calorie counting. The shock is still here even after 4 months of closely counting. I had Thai lemongrass beef yesterday (1/2 portion & 1/2 cp rice), and I have learned to err on the side of high.

As always, a great post.
connorcream
5'8.5"
48 yrs
Started calorie counting
10/6/2009
start/current
192/mid 120's maintaining
Maintaining a year

User avatar
sophiasapientia
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:09 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Pictures of Portion size differences - less vs. more

Post by sophiasapientia » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:13 pm

BrightAngel wrote:Some additional Portion Control is necessary for many women to lose-weight or even maintain their weight.
The No S diet has good basic rules,
but it isn't MAGIC.
Very true ... The question that I'm facing as a shorter, 30-something year old woman, is how much portion control is necessary, kwim? I already use smaller plates (salad/9") and get in moderate exercise almost everyday. I really, really want to lose and maintain by doing Vanilla No S and not have to resort to anything that I wouldn't be able to do happily on a long-term basis. We'll see, I guess. :?
Restarted No S (3rd times a charm!) January 2010 at 145 lbs

dmarie710
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:48 am
Location: Temecula

Post by dmarie710 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:41 pm

how fitting you have posted this. After 3 months of restarting NoS, I have had to resort to counting calories cause I have not lost weight. I am 5'3 and weigh 133.5 as of today. Oh yeah, I'm also 38 years old. I only have 13.5 pounds to lose, and it's tough. I do work out also. We'll see how this goes. I'm still sticking to 3 meals a day and staying in habit.

connorcream
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by connorcream » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:40 pm

dmarie710 wrote:how fitting you have posted this. After 3 months of restarting NoS, I have had to resort to counting calories cause I have not lost weight.
Same here except it took me a year before I realized I needed something else.

Best wishes on your journey.
connorcream
5'8.5"
48 yrs
Started calorie counting
10/6/2009
start/current
192/mid 120's maintaining
Maintaining a year

clarinetgal
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:16 am
Location: Western Washington State

Post by clarinetgal » Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:09 am

Very helpful! Thanks!

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:26 pm

I know this is getting technical, but do you know what your bodyfat% is? I just checked your BMI and you are in the normal range, so it is going to be harder to fight your way down, esp. if you are a mesomorph and naturally have more muscle.

Check out this site.

http://www.halls.md/body-mass-index/bmi.htm

It includes info on how you compare to your peers in age/ht.wt. If, however, you find you still want to lose, you're going to have to tweak something. Some have suggested fewer caloric beverages. I say look honestly at whether you are actually hungry when you have them. Don't have anything just because you can--just in case that's what you are doing. And/or add more resistance exercise. If your pants are looser, does it matter what the scale says? Ditto on the vegetable/fruit ratio to dense foods on your plate. I often use the "hand" measurement: palm size of protein, fist size of dense starch, two fists of veggie/fruit, one thumb of fat.

I'd recommend Brad Pilon for calorie restriction advice before calorie counting, though.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
BrightAngel
Posts: 2093
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Central California
Contact:

Post by BrightAngel » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:39 pm

oolala53 wrote: I'd recommend Brad Pilon for calorie restriction advice before calorie counting, though.
I am a "calorie counter", and
I love the way Brad Pilon thinks.
I've read his e-books and value his advice.

He is very much for the "calories in vs calories out" principle.
His main advice for most people is to "eat less".
He isn't AGAINST calorie counting,
although he, personally, doesn't count calories,
or follow any special food plan, except for a day or two of
EatStopEat 24 hr fasting a week.

My own personal maintenance plan, is based on a combo of
Reinhard's Habit principle, mixed with Brad Pilon's eat less principle,
together with calorie counting,
along with some misc. additional factors.
BrightAngel - (Dr. Collins)
See: DietHobby. com

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:50 pm

BrightAngel, you have had an amazing journey and admirable success. You are definitely in the healthy range for your height. I just experimented with your height, weight, and my age on the Halls site. I'd be slimmer than 90% of my peers at your stats. Holy Toledo. I'm just trying to get to the 28%ile, which would also put me at my highest normal BMI. If No S takes me lower, glory be. But that's me.

Just in case I'm confusing anyone, BMI and bodyfat are two different measurements. And so were the percentiles I mentioned just above.

I better get off the boards and do something else productive!
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
BrightAngel
Posts: 2093
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Central California
Contact:

Post by BrightAngel » Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:31 pm

oolala53 wrote:BrightAngel, you have had an amazing journey and admirable success.
You are definitely in the healthy range for your height.
I just experimented with your height, weight, and my age on the Halls site.
I'd be slimmer than 90% of my peers at your stats.
Thanks. Image
Right now, at this weight my BMI is near the high-middle of the range for "Normal" weight,
and this puts me in the 10th percentile,
which means I am slimmer than 90 of other women my height etc.

Although it takes a great deal of work just to keep it there,
I'm still hoping...in time...to drop it just a bit,
and get it back to the middle or low-middle of my "Normal" range.

Good luck to you in your Efforts.
BrightAngel - (Dr. Collins)
See: DietHobby. com

dmarie710
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:48 am
Location: Temecula

Post by dmarie710 » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:09 pm

Brad Pilon makes such a great amount of sense. It seems to me that he had a blog post on calorie counting and said it could be a good idea for a short amount of time, but not to be obsessive about it. It was a while ago when I read it, so I could be mistaken. I also really appreciate John Barban's input.

User avatar
Nichole
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:37 pm
Location: PENNSYLVANIA
Contact:

Post by Nichole » Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:22 pm

I wish people would learn this. Calorie counting/healthy eating has taught me so much. It really makes maintaining a healthy weight almost easy! And now it's helping me to gradually gain weight for my pregnancy :). 3 lbs so far (11 weeks pregnant)! :D
"Anyone can cook." ~ Chef Gusteau, Ratatouille

User avatar
DaveMc
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:28 pm

Post by DaveMc » Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:28 pm

Mazel tov, Nichole! So, let's see, you're eating for two, so that means six meals a day, right? :)

User avatar
Nichole
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:37 pm
Location: PENNSYLVANIA
Contact:

Post by Nichole » Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:04 pm

Lol! It means I get to have a serving of OJ in the morning and a couple extra snacks! Yaay! I haven't changed too much of how I eat (I never did strict No-S as I allowed a snack or two), just eating a slight bit more... I don't REALLY have to gain until after 12 weeks.
"Anyone can cook." ~ Chef Gusteau, Ratatouille

connorcream
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by connorcream » Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:52 pm

Nichole wrote:I wish people would learn this. Calorie counting/healthy eating has taught me so much. It really makes maintaining a healthy weight almost easy! And now it's helping me to gradually gain weight for my pregnancy :). 3 lbs so far (11 weeks pregnant)! :D
Yes it is a very good thing. My son who has Crohn's is using his food journal to gain weight as well. There are many wonderful uses for the information from calorie counting.

Congrats on the new baby:-)
connorcream
5'8.5"
48 yrs
Started calorie counting
10/6/2009
start/current
192/mid 120's maintaining
Maintaining a year

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:30 pm

Nichole wrote:Lol! It means I get to have a serving of OJ in the morning and a couple extra snacks! Yaay! I haven't changed too much of how I eat (I never did strict No-S as I allowed a snack or two), just eating a slight bit more... I don't REALLY have to gain until after 12 weeks.
If I'm remembering correctly, it takes 300 extra calories daily to grow a baby. Not much, really -- you've probably got it about right!
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

User avatar
Nichole
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:37 pm
Location: PENNSYLVANIA
Contact:

Post by Nichole » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:02 pm

connorcream wrote:
Nichole wrote:I wish people would learn this. Calorie counting/healthy eating has taught me so much. It really makes maintaining a healthy weight almost easy! And now it's helping me to gradually gain weight for my pregnancy :). 3 lbs so far (11 weeks pregnant)! :D
Yes it is a very good thing. My son who has Crohn's is using his food journal to gain weight as well. There are many wonderful uses for the information from calorie counting.

Congrats on the new baby:-)
Thank you! My brother (24) has Crohn's disease (on top of having a learning disability - they say he shows signs of Aspberger's). So I know how that goes.... My mom and his doctor likes him at a certain weight in case of a flair-up :/ . Last time he lost 15 lbs! But because of the extra padding, he was okay. It's rough. Luckily that doesn't happen too often.

Wosnes: Thank you! Yes, they say 300 calories or so. I think I'm definitely hitting that, lol. But I don't want to "go crazy". It's all about portions and not indulging in too many sweets, like usual, as you know.
"Anyone can cook." ~ Chef Gusteau, Ratatouille

Post Reply