Interesting short essay on dieting vs. habit change

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
User avatar
WouldYouEva
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:26 am
Location: Suburban Maryland, USA

Interesting short essay on dieting vs. habit change

Post by WouldYouEva » Wed May 13, 2009 2:39 am

A friend of mine wrote up her thoughts on why dieting isn't sustainable but habit change is that I thought we might find familiar, seeing how NoS is more about the latter than the former. If you want to read it, it's posted at http://nellorat.livejournal.com/387182.html.

User avatar
mimi
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: The Shenandoah Valley of Virginia

Post by mimi » Wed May 13, 2009 12:04 pm

I'd love to read your friend's essay, but for some reason that link wouldn't load for me...it came up as an error. Anyone else having that problem?
Discovered NoS: April 16, 2007
Restarted once again: July 14, 2011
Quitting is not an option...
If you start to slip, tie a knot and hang on!
Remember that good enough is... good enough.
Strive for progress, not perfection!

Cassie
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: London

Post by Cassie » Wed May 13, 2009 12:06 pm

Yup, link wouldn't open for me too. Could you resend?

User avatar
WouldYouEva
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:26 am
Location: Suburban Maryland, USA

Post by WouldYouEva » Wed May 13, 2009 12:10 pm

See if this works:

http://nellorat.livejournal.com/387182.html

or email me at eva@evawhitley.net and I can send an email with a working link.

It's working for me, but then, I'm on her friend's list. If it continues to be wonky, maybe I can get her permission to repost here.

Cassie
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: London

Post by Cassie » Wed May 13, 2009 12:20 pm

Yeah, have read it. She's right, it's far more sustainable & logical to work towards habit change & not weight loss (or at least not directly). Weight loss in itself gets you nowhere; you might very easily re-gain the weight (as we all sadly know). But wider habit change makes much more sense, it's the only way to keep the weight off permanently...

User avatar
la_loser
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart. . .land

full of self-hatred?

Post by la_loser » Wed May 13, 2009 1:42 pm

I totally agree that No S is all about HABIT not DIET. . . and I believe that is where the emphasis should be.

I was a bit surprised to see the comment below regarding how "full of self-hatred, etc." the No S boards are. I guess I must have blinders on, but these boards seem so positive to me for the most part and are a place where posters are trying to free themselves from that sort of emotional sabotage. As a matter of fact, it seems to me that when someone does post something that puts themselves down, someone quickly jumps in to reassure them to not be so hard on themselves-or in KCCC's words, "Be gentle with yourself." I know I tend to be the cheerleader here and am quite defensive of NO S but hopefully anyone who checks out the No S boards will be able to determine for themselves how they feel about them. It is good to find another source to spread the word of course.

WouldYouEva said on the link posted above:
I'm happy with NoS but their message boards are, not surprisingly, full of a lot of self-hatred, food obsession, and guilt when the weekend rolls around and they can eat "S" food (snacks, sweets, and seconds). Pointing out the push to snack the food industry has reminds me a lot of consciousness raising sessions in the 70s, and seeing the fnords in another context.

And Reinhard's emphasis on no goals other than following the three rules, and talking about "before" and "during" rather than "after" seems a bit like what you're talking about. And making the metric of success "days on habit" rather than "pounds lost" seems more sustainable in the long run. I'd put NoS more in the "habit change" camp than in the "diet" camp.
So--yes--No S IS about habit. . .and getting away from obsessions, etc. --thank goodness!
LA Loser. . . well on my way to becoming an LA Winner. :lol:

Thalia
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Thalia » Wed May 13, 2009 3:48 pm

but their message boards are, not surprisingly, full of a lot of self-hatred, food obsession, and guilt
Our SOCIETY is full of a lot of self-hatred, food obsession, and guilt, so it would be surprising if this little message board were somehow exempt!

User avatar
la_loser
Posts: 629
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart. . .land

Agreed!

Post by la_loser » Wed May 13, 2009 4:44 pm

I completely agree about that. . . I'm just grateful that at least here, posters find support that consistently encourages us to have a better self-image and accept ourselves! :D

That's one of the most refreshing things about No S I think--we tend to disallow ourselves to have pity parties! Mark it and move on! (thanks Vicki)
LA Loser. . . well on my way to becoming an LA Winner. :lol:

User avatar
WouldYouEva
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:26 am
Location: Suburban Maryland, USA

Re: full of self-hatred?

Post by WouldYouEva » Sat May 16, 2009 3:39 am

LA_Loser wrote:I totally agree that No S is all about HABIT not DIET. . . and I believe that is where the emphasis should be.

I was a bit surprised to see the comment below regarding how "full of self-hatred, etc." the No S boards are. I guess I must have blinders on, but these boards seem so positive to me for the most part and are a place where posters are trying to free themselves from that sort of emotional sabotage. As a matter of fact, it seems to me that when someone does post something that puts themselves down, someone quickly jumps in to reassure them to not be so hard on themselves-or in KCCC's words, "Be gentle with yourself." I know I tend to be the cheerleader here and am quite defensive of NO S but hopefully anyone who checks out the No S boards will be able to determine for themselves how they feel about them. It is good to find another source to spread the word of course.

So--yes--No S IS about habit. . .and getting away from obsessions, etc. --thank goodness!
I guess we see what we expect. I can post specific cites to self-hating and food obsessions, but I'm glad you don't see them. I do find women bemoaning their size who are the weight I would love to be are triggering for my self-hatred.

guadopt1997
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: full of self-hatred?

Post by guadopt1997 » Mon May 18, 2009 1:18 pm

WouldYouEva wrote:[I do find women bemoaning their size who are the weight I would love to be are triggering for my self-hatred.
I have a different reaction to that. I roll my eyes at THEM :P and think that they should consider themselves lucky. I think that I should emulate them in not letting my weight get so out of control but check it sooner if I start regaining. But mostly I avoid their check-ins! :)

User avatar
gratefuldeb67
Posts: 6256
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Great Neck, NY

Post by gratefuldeb67 » Mon May 18, 2009 2:56 pm

Sorry Eva, but I have to respectfully disagree completely with your comment that these message boards are filled with posts that are filled with self hatred.
Maybe that's a projection of your own feelings?
So far I see, even when people share their frustrations, that most people here are very optimistic and positive in describing their experiences.
That's one of the reasons I love this board and this group of people.

Have a good week.
8) Debs
There is no Wisdom greater than Kindness

User avatar
WouldYouEva
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:26 am
Location: Suburban Maryland, USA

Post by WouldYouEva » Tue May 19, 2009 2:35 am

Sigh. Just forget it.

User avatar
Mavilu
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: California

Post by Mavilu » Tue May 19, 2009 5:07 am

A tip: people here isn't like the people you'll find at L.J.; "sigh, forget it" won't add anything positive to the discussion in this forum.

That said, I've gotten out of lurking to add that there is a big difference between "self- criticism" and "self-hatred"; if I say here or anywhere else that I look better without spilling out of my pants at the waist and thus I want to do something about it, it doesn't necessarily mean that I hate myself, rather that I would like a change, either buy new pants or lose some weight; if everytime that we admit to not liking something about ourselves, we are "self-hating", then, we would never improve throughout our lives; imagine: "I didn't do that well in my last report... *gasp* I'm not accepting myself as I am, I hate myself!, I think I'm not good enough as I am!, that's wrong, I'm a beautiful being just as I am" and you continue to perform so-so just as before; you wouldn't get too far in life.
This is the same, you can adopt that healthy attitude in many areas of your life, but not all of us will apply them to the same areas that you do.

Within a healthy range and with a healthy attitude, there are no limits to how much we should weight or what efforts we should do to do so; that some people don't like how they look at a weight that you would kill to be isn't an indication that they are practising "self-hatred", they might be smaller that you, shorter, older, younger, have a medical condition, be from other culture or simply have a different standard as to how they want to look; far too many greys to make it a black or white kind of thing, the self-hatred versus self-acceptance that you seem to believe in.

But, if your view of wanting to lose weight is different and feel like telling us so, by all mean, feel free to share why and how and in turn, we'll either agree or disagree with you and it will turn out into a nice debate, just like the other people that has posted in your thread.
And now, back to lurking.

StrawberryRoan
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Location: United States

Post by StrawberryRoan » Tue May 19, 2009 11:29 am

Well, as a poster who doesn't have much weight to lose - let me tell you that losing ten or twenty pounds is an important issue if that if the goal one is striving toward.

I have always encouraged others who are trying to lose five pounds or one hundred and five pounds.

Who among us should decide how much weight is enough that we should not "roll our eyes" at a fellow poster?

Not me.

:wink:

kccc
Posts: 3957
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:12 am

Post by kccc » Thu May 21, 2009 2:33 am

I actually went and read the original post/comment, and I think I see the point WouldYouEva was trying to make... here's the line that mentions self-hatred - bold is my addition:
I'm happy with NoS but their message boards are, not surprisingly, full of a lot of self-hatred, food obsession, and guilt when the weekend rolls around and they can eat "S" food (snacks, sweets, and seconds).
The rest of the post was VERY supportive of No-S. This one line, taken out of context, seems to have created a tempest in a teapot.

To me, the critical part is the "S-days" observation. And I see her point. The tone of the board is, IMHO, generally very sane and supportive - just like the No-S plan itself. But the one place where typical diet-neurosis-thinking tends to surface is around S-days. People either don't believe they're a necessary part of the overall plan and try to restrict them, or feel guilty about what they ate... there's a good bit of angst around S-days. (And I've contributed my fair share, though I think I've gotten better over time.)

The post never said that the general tenor of the boards was self-hating. As others have said, noticing room for improvement is not the same as hatred. So, WouldYouEva simply noticed a place where many of us have some room for improvement.

Mark it and move on. And let's all be gentle with ourselves, and with each other. :)

User avatar
Blithe Morning
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:56 pm
Location: South Dakota

Post by Blithe Morning » Thu May 21, 2009 2:31 pm

The reason the original link wouldn't work is that there is a period at the end of the sentence which is read as being part of the URL.

Post Reply