Cocoa Crack and "The Snack Mindset"

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5921
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Cocoa Crack and "The Snack Mindset"

Post by reinhard » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:24 pm

Disturbingly funny article about Kellogg's in the new york times earlier this week: Kellogg Takes Aim at Snack foods.

(I hate to get all paranoid about evil corporations, but boy do these guys make it hard!)

First disturbing/funny aspect, the names they give these sugar cereals, it's like they're marketing to heroin addicts: first there was Sugar smack[s], now "Krave," -- I feel like like "Cocoa Crack" must be next.

Second even more disturbing if somewhat less funny aspect: as if sugar cereal wasn't bad enough, Kellogg is feeling the need to branch beyond it's traditional core competency into sugar snacks because sitting down to an actual meal (however instant) is no longer sufficiently convenient for the modern consumer.
cereal is losing ground to other breakfast options, like frozen food, cereal bars and yogurt. The reason... is that fewer Americans are inclined to sit down with a bowl, milk and a spoon when they start their mornings. The ultimate convenience food — which is how cereal was once billed — is just not convenient enough any more.
Americans might not be buying Corn Flakes the way they did a decade ago, but they love a good snacking occasion, and shoehorning a few more Pop-Tarts, Nutri-Grain bars and Special K Savory Herb crackers into our day is a core mission for the company.
Kellogg's is tapping into what they call "the snack mind-set," especially in foreign markets where there is vastly greater growth potential (snacking + obesity rates have to be topping out here in the states, right? how much bigger can we possible get?).

The third disturbing and not at all funny thing is that I'm not even sure the author gets what the real problem is: not the fact that Kellogg makes junk food, but the "snacking mindset" itself, how inherently destructive it is, and how frightening it is that it is poised to spread even further.

Reinhard

User avatar
~reneew
Posts: 2190
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:20 pm
Location: midwest US

Post by ~reneew » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:35 pm

I agree. Last night I saw a commercial promoting cereal with chocolate chunks as a 9pm snack when that chocolate crave comes along. Ug. But I guess it's better than the bowl of icecream my hubby has then. :roll:
I guess this doesn't work unless you actually do it.
Please pray for me

snapdragon
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:43 pm
Location: midwest

Post by snapdragon » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:10 pm

My husband often eats a bowl of cereal late at night. It is funny though.

BeingGreen
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:50 am
Location: Portland OR

Post by BeingGreen » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:20 pm

American life has become so busy and crazy that people don't have time to sit down for a bowl of cereal and milk?! With obesity rates skyrocketing, I think people need to rethink their priorities. And Kellogg's is not helping the situation!!

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:20 pm

~reneew wrote:I agree. Last night I saw a commercial promoting cereal with chocolate chunks as a 9pm snack when that chocolate crave comes along. Ug. But I guess it's better than the bowl of icecream my hubby has then. :roll:
Seriously, I think it depends on the ice cream -- it could be healthier! I was just thinking this morning that if you see a commercial for some food product on TV, you would be better off not buying it. First, it's probably not really food. Second, it's not good for you.

It's been quite a while since I saw an advertisement for ice cream -- ANY ice cream. Occasionally in the warm months I'll see an ad for whatever the grocery has on sale that week.

I've been chuckling lately at the number of "new" food products I've seen advertised. I guarantee you, none of them will find their way into my grocery cart.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

User avatar
NoSnacker
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:40 am
Location: Buffalo, New York

Post by NoSnacker » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:36 pm

wosnes wrote:I guarantee you, none of them will find their way into my grocery cart.
When I go shopping these days I might pick it up, look at it and put it back down...

Trying to stay on the outside perimeters of the store!!
Age 56: SBMI=30.6 (12/1/13) CBMI 28.9 (2/2/14) GBMI-24.8

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:02 pm

NoSnacker wrote:
wosnes wrote:I guarantee you, none of them will find their way into my grocery cart.
When I go shopping these days I might pick it up, look at it and put it back down...

Trying to stay on the outside perimeters of the store!!
There is good food in the center of the store, too. It's just in among the not-so-good stuff.

I don't know about where you live, but my area doesn't have much in the way of bulk bins, except at Whole Foods. So all the grains, nuts, seeds, spices and so on are in the middle of the store. I'm not even tempted by the "edible food-like substances" anymore. Chips will call my name now and again, but while they are food (they're just potatoes, oil and salt -- no weird ingredients) I just don't have them often.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:04 pm

My family had dessert every night and ice cream later. A small square of cake. One scoop of ice cream. And we had sugared cereals, though we often had Cheerios and Rice Krispies, which are less obvious than the ones I preferred. And we had oatmeal, or eggs, too. Right, Mom didn't work. I wasn't actually overweight--though relatively heavy for my peer group, but not actually overweight, until I went on a diet the year before I left home-- lost ten, gained twenty. And on and up.

But what Kellogg is doing makes them either rogues or fools, and both are dangerous. Yet they wouldn't keep making something that didn't sell. If people buy, they make it. If they don't, like McDonald's valiant try at a veggie burger, they stop. Should there be a tax on processed foods to combat their use, like there is on cigarettes? How are we going to get people to school the producers? Is it possible? Might this weight issue reach a peak and then decline?

I admit I eat my breakfast in the car while I'm on the freeway. I actually take longer to eat then! I'm very good at not spilling the cereal, but I would, if it came to that. I can't imagine having to get kids out the door with me.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
Jennifer24747
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:08 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Post by Jennifer24747 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:40 am

What drives me nuts is the whole "Special K diet" concept that Kellogg's markets. They've got products for every moment of the day if you're on that. Cereal, chips, meal bars, "protein water," snack bars, Special K brownies (which sound vaguely illegal, by the way). You're supposed to have ONE serving of cereal for breakfast, which is 120 calories, about 3/4 cup to 1 cup, and about 12 grams of sugar. So...48 of your 120 calories are from sugar, first thing in the morning? Does that keep ANYONE satisfied? And then you spend the rest of the day shoving sugared Special K junk down your throat every three hours? But I guess all that sugar will keep people addicted and coming back for more, even if they're starving. It drives me nuts because so many of my girlfriends turn to this stupid diet when they're going on vacation or have a wedding coming up or something.

Making real, healthy, delicious foods is not that hard, and it doesn't have to be time-consuming. I wish people could see beyond marketing and realize this! But everyone loves a quick fix. When you can drop a dress size in two weeks, why do anything else? Insert eye roll here.
Discovered NoS April 25, 2012!
SW: 157
CW: 156
GW: 140-145

Rainman
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:54 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

You can decline to hear their messages

Post by Rainman » Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:05 pm

This is one more example of where taking in a minimum of media makes you a happier person. We have our meals as a family, without the TV on, keeping us blissfully unaware of innovations at Kellogg. That makes it a lot easier to stick to the No-S rule!

I don't like what Kellogg is doing, but the way to combat it is through millions of people making better choices. A government powerful enough to prohibit Kellogg from doing things I disagree with is likely to micromanage my life in some way I am not too fond of either. Overly tasty snacks is one of the excesses of capitalism, but it beats totalitarianism.

Great post. It helps to know what I need to not know about!

Post Reply