No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.
Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating
-
Hunter Gatherer
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:30 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by Hunter Gatherer » Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:26 am
This is back from December so forgive me if someone already posted this.
Artificial sweeteners not a “get out of bad habits free†card
But then, we knew that already, right?

"You've been reading about arctic explorers," I accused him. "If a man's starving he'll eat anything, but when he's just ordinarily hungry he doesn't want to clutter up his stomach with a lot of candy."
Dashiell Hammett
-
ShannahR
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:51 pm
Post
by ShannahR » Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:33 pm
Wow. That part of that that really got me was:
“[T]he absolute preference for taste sweetness may lead to a re-ordering in the hierarchy of potentially addictive stimuli, with sweetened diets. . . taking precedence over cocaine and possibly other drugs of abuse.â€
Digest that for a moment. Sweetness beats out coke.
Yikes

-
reinhard
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5958
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
- Location: Cambridge, MA
-
Contact:
Post
by reinhard » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:22 pm
Thanks for the great link, HG. Nice to see some evidence for my intuition!
Digest that for a moment. Sweetness beats out coke
I guess that's why coke was able to get rid of the coke
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola did once contain an estimated nine milligrams of cocaine per glass, but in 1903 it was removed.
Reinhard
-
Hunter Gatherer
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:30 am
- Location: Texas
Post
by Hunter Gatherer » Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:26 am
I liked her comment
If we constantly hammer our taste buds with simplistic, blunt-instrument flavours, we don’t develop the ability to appreciate the subtler flavours that occur in the natural world.
The sad irony, of course, is that the natural-world flavours are infinitely more interesting. Developing sensitivity to real-world flavours actually makes you a more careful, nuanced eater who focuses on food quality, and ultimately enjoys food more. After all, be honest: have you really savoured the bouquet of cheezies? If you really focused on the scent and taste notes of Rock Star drink, or Twizzlers, you wouldn’t touch the $#!^ because you’d start to notice the waxy mouth feel or the chemical aftertaste. But if I handed you a $10 Godiva truffle, you’d certainly spend a little quality time with that bad boy before snarfing it down.
And I thought that it was funny that the authors of the paper referred to "limited tolerance for complex tastes" as your tastes being in an "infantile state." Probably a good description, but not very flattering.
I also thought it was cool that our taste-buds are so much more effective at picking out bitter than sweet.
"You've been reading about arctic explorers," I accused him. "If a man's starving he'll eat anything, but when he's just ordinarily hungry he doesn't want to clutter up his stomach with a lot of candy."
Dashiell Hammett