I'm back. I get it and I love it.

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
MrsPartridge
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:06 pm

I'm back. I get it and I love it.

Post by MrsPartridge » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:01 am

I fell away from this but now I'm back. I read up some more on how snacking is not good for the hormones. I now get it and after the 2nd day, I'm having no issues with keeping it up.

I know now that the first 3 hours after a meal, insulin is released and then for the next 2-3 hours, the liver supplies your snack in the form of glycogen. I never got to that stage but I was throwing my insulin up all the time with constant snacking. Even so called healthy snacks like fruit between meals is bad.

I have lots of energy because I'm not always digesting food. I was always saying that I can't do something because "I'm about to eat" or "I just ate". Now I'm cleaning, exercising, walking etc. because I'm free to do things for a longer timespan.

I have more money too because I see all the snack foods I used to buy and don't need now. Every grocery visit included mid-meal snacks. Now I'm shocked at how that meant an extra $15 per visit.

No S isn't etched in stone so it's ok to make it work for you. I don't have S days or special treats. I just add desserts to a meal whenever I think I need to. My meal must never make me feel stuffed.

Clarica
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:02 am
Contact:

Post by Clarica » Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:53 am

awesome post. I had never heard that about hormones, insulin and glycogen.

jellybeans01
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:10 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by jellybeans01 » Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:08 am

wow, I just learned something new, cool.

mamamia
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 10:45 am

Post by mamamia » Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:24 pm

I know what you mean about having more energy and feeling free to do stuff rather than worrying about if you'll be gone too long and miss your next snack. I leave in the morning to run errands, etc., and sometimes don't get home until mid-afternoon for lunch. I am not buying crap on the road to get my snack in. I am starting a full time job this week and I am so glad to have discovered No-S befoe starting, because now I know I will be fine with just a lunch break (and coffee!). Its not a constant worry anymore!

finallyfull
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:10 pm

Post by finallyfull » Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:46 pm

I totally agree -- I love that No S will wait patiently for every time I may decide to go try something else, like "try to eat less" or whatever I come up with that inevitably seems to slowly pack on pounds, even if it starts out with loss. I am back after about a year, totally vanilla this time, and after nine weeks I am regularly noticing that it encompasses a whole bunch of sane principles that are normally lacking in me (like being really hungry before a meal. duh).

Welcome back!

User avatar
NoSnacker
Posts: 1481
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:40 am
Location: Buffalo, New York

Re: I'm back. I get it and I love it.

Post by NoSnacker » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:40 pm

MrsPartridge wrote: I know now that the first 3 hours after a meal, insulin is released and then for the next 2-3 hours, the liver supplies your snack in the form of glycogen. I never got to that stage but I was throwing my insulin up all the time with constant snacking. Even so called healthy snacks like fruit between meals is bad.
This is great to know, another reason to adhere to the no snacking rule.
Age 56: SBMI=30.6 (12/1/13) CBMI 28.9 (2/2/14) GBMI-24.8

oolala53
Posts: 10104
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:56 pm

You have now explained what I noticed before No S; that my worst times to overeat were one-to-three hours after a meal. If I could make it to three hours, I was usually fine. Most days, I love hour four on.And the first hours are okay now, too.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 71
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
12/20/24 24.1

There is no S better than (mod) Vanilla No S

User avatar
NoSRocks
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:51 am

Post by NoSRocks » Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:06 pm

WELCOME BACK!!!
No S-er since December 2009
Streamlined S Days: 6/25/12
SW: 170 /CW: 127
Weight loss to date: 43 lbs

Strawberry Roan
Posts: 1208
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:51 pm

Post by Strawberry Roan » Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:33 am

Welcome back and I agree with everything you have posted. (I too had to "return" to make it stick. And it has.

And, about the money, isn't that so true? I realize now that I am not walking down the candy aisle, the cookie aisle, the potato chips aisle, etc. at the store. More money for fresh fruit and veggies. When people say it costs a lot to eat healthy, I think to myself - only if you are buying unhealthy stuff at the same time.

Best of luck to you.
:wink:
Berry

Post Reply