Would potato chips be ok?

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
MrsPartridge
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:06 pm

Would potato chips be ok?

Post by MrsPartridge » Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:08 pm

I'm new and this No-S seems very doable. However I wonder if I could add a small serving of potato chips to my lunch? It's not sugar and it's not a snack - just part of lunch. Would that work?

Thanks.

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:48 pm

Yes, it's okay. Maybe not the BEST choice, but okay and more than a few of us have done that.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

User avatar
gratefuldeb67
Posts: 6256
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Great Neck, NY

Post by gratefuldeb67 » Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:52 pm

It's fine.
Better to have the food you are craving as part of your meal.
And it is far superior than eating the whole bag.
Good luck!
8) Debs
There is no Wisdom greater than Kindness

User avatar
rpm
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Indiana

Post by rpm » Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:48 am

Mrs. P,

As long as the chips will fit on the plate then you are okay. I have only been following No S for 5 weeks but I figure that if it can fit on plate I can eat it as long as the food is not a sweet.
René
Taking care of me, one No S Day at a time!

MrsPartridge
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:06 pm

Maybe I don't need potato chips afterall

Post by MrsPartridge » Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:29 am

I always had chips around here because they made good snacks. Today, day one of No-S, I didn't see any point to eating chips with lunch. As the book says, it seems silly to eat snack food as part of a meal.

I'm quite happy with this so far, but it's only day one. I hope I can make this a lifetime habit.

I remember as a kid eating 3 meals. We didn't own any snack foods - no one did. It would have been weird to eat outside of those meals. We went about our lives between meals.

connorcream
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by connorcream » Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:16 pm

I always had chips around here because they made good snacks. Today, day one of No-S, I didn't see any point to eating chips with lunch. As the book says, it seems silly to eat snack food as part of a meal.


I need to reread that. May weight loss has been very very slow. I usually do have potato chips when I eat a sandwich. Just a few not a serving size a couple times a week. Never between meals. Maybe at 46 yrs, it is enough calories to stop progress.
connorcream
5'8.5"
48 yrs
Started calorie counting
10/6/2009
start/current
192/mid 120's maintaining
Maintaining a year

User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5924
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Post by reinhard » Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:10 pm

Relevant "teaser content" from the book (page 36):
Are Snacks When I Eat or What I Eat?

For the purposes of the No S Diet, snacks are when,
not what. Pretzels with lunch are lunch. Maybe not a
particularly healthy lunch, but the No S Diet delegates
that micro- decision to you. A snack, for No S Diet pur-
poses, is any food you eat between meals. A meal is any
food you eat at meals. The kind of food is completely
up to you.

That being said, you will probably wind up eating a
lot less unhealthy snack food. Why? Because you’ll feel
silly eating snacks for meals. They’re in the wrong
conceptual category. You’ll want meal foods for meals; and
that’s great, because as I just pointed out, snack foods
tend to be terrible for you. In this way, you indirectly
limit the what with the when.

Conversely, of course, eating foods that you would
normally eat at a meal (like a salad or a sandwich)
between meals still counts as a snack. So there’s no get-
ting around this rule by eating a steak au poivre on
your coffee break instead of a bag of chips.

User avatar
FarmerHal
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:54 pm

Post by FarmerHal » Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:59 pm

I have them with lunch. Generally, it's crackers for me, not chips. If I include them as a lunch side, then I am less likely to binge on them later inthe day.
{FarmerHal} ...previously Shamrockmommy...
Vanilla NoS... Making good habits.
Restart 12/2015, size 22
3/2016 size 18
1/2018 size 18

Post Reply