Heads up on food packaging

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
Graham
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: London, UK

Heads up on food packaging

Post by Graham » Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:23 am

Just spotted this in the news today - recycled cardboard used to package food is contaminating the food - right through the inner wrapper! Another reason to either avoid or restrict packaged food.
Details here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12663183

User avatar
BrightAngel
Posts: 2093
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Central California
Contact:

Post by BrightAngel » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:49 am

What next ? Image
BrightAngel - (Dr. Collins)
See: DietHobby. com

User avatar
ImprisonedBeauty
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:03 am
Location: Central Pennsylvania

Post by ImprisonedBeauty » Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:33 pm

Great. I guess it's true what they say... EVERYTHING can give you cancer. :-/

So how do we know whether a product is packaged in recycled cardboard or not?
Taking it one small step at a time.

User avatar
sarah.grace
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:11 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by sarah.grace » Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:34 pm

I do think it is a legitimate concern that cardboard made from recycled printed cardboard can contain higher amounts of mineral oil than cardboard made from 'virgin' pulp.

HOWEVER- from my experience in the pulp and paper (containerboard AKA cardboard) industry, printed cardboard is not often recycled. It is far easier and cheaper to recycle cardboard that has not made it to consumer-level (been printed/glued/etc). The process of re-hydra-pulping this cardboard to acceptable grades (purity/color/texture) requires more chemicals and more mechanical work, making it more expensive than the alternatives (recycling pre-consumer cardboard, or even virgin pulp).

I guess I take a 'moderate' view of claims like this. Nothing is as extreme as the media likes to make it out to be.

Graham
Posts: 1570
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Graham » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:52 am

sarah.grace wrote:I do think it is a legitimate concern that cardboard made from recycled printed cardboard can contain higher amounts of mineral oil than cardboard made from 'virgin' pulp.

HOWEVER- from my experience in the pulp and paper (containerboard AKA cardboard) industry, printed cardboard is not often recycled.
Just to clarify - the article states cardboard is being made with recycled newspapers, not recycled cardboard. It is based on European research and the picture may be different in the US - it presumably depends on economic issues, are the incentives to use recycled material to make cardboard as great in the US, or are the raw materials for virgin board cheaper? I don't know. I can say that the BBC isn't known for alarmist treatment of issues, I just thought I'd like my No S friends to have the information to take whatever precautions they might think sensible. Long term storage of foods in cardboard containers might not be too smart.

User avatar
sarah.grace
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:11 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by sarah.grace » Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:56 pm

I wasn't trying to be contradictory or discredit the article- just sharing my thoughts!

So I was thinking about this some more- trying to think of what food I eat that does stay in cardboard packaging long-term. The only thing I came up with is a box of cereal. I guess it would be easy to take the cereal bag out of the box, and throw out the box. Better safe than sorry?
What other foods am I forgetting? :P

Oh, what about baking soda?

Post Reply