Is 2 meals acceptable on No S days??

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
mricem
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:59 pm

Is 2 meals acceptable on No S days??

Post by mricem » Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:28 pm

Sorry for such a silly question, my book has not arrived yet, but I was wondering because 2x my first week this was what I did. I ate breakfast, ate my lunch pretty late (around 3) so when I made dinner for my family @ 5pm I was not hungry at all. How important is it to eat 3 meals a day?

milliem
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:30 pm

Post by milliem » Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:14 pm

NoS doesn't actually prescribe how many meals to eat per day, just that you don't snack outside of planned meals. There are people who eat 2, 3 or 4 meals per day, it's all about what works for you! I'm sure you won't fade away or abandon all hope from eating one meal less on one day :)

On those days you did not eat with your family, did you fail later on? If not, it's probably ok. If so, you might want to plan to eat lunch earlier or to reheat dinner a bit later when you do get hungry.

oolala53
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:08 pm

Yes, the number of meals isn't set in stone. However, for family unity's sake, I gently suggest you try eating very lightly at lunch time or perhaps earlier so that you can be hungry for and share a moderate meal with your family in the evening. One of the beauties of No S is how much it allows for relaxed, joyfully-shared eating, which is the bugaboo of so many people.

You might just have beginner's euphoria, too, as going until 3 p.m. for lunch isn't routine for most. That could change and the issue could become moot.

Congrats on not being compelled to snack!
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23

There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)

User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5926
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Post by reinhard » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:28 pm

Not a silly question at all.

I think 3 meals is a safer place to start for most people (supported by social convention, good middle ground between potential privation and potential excess), but if 2 meals works better for you by all means stick with it (lots of people have reported successfully doing this).

That being said, in general, according to the scientific literature, skipping breakfast is statistically an unsuccessful strategy -- so do be careful.

As oolala53 suggested, if you'd rather do three but are afraid of the potential for excess, you don't have to make all three meals equally large. A "token" breakfast might provide some extra insurance (both calorically and morally) that you make it to your late lunch (you want to avoid spur of the moment backsliding if you get hungry and think "maybe I should have a extra meal -- or 2 or 3 or 5 -- after all"). You want to avoid feeling "moral license" (great term from the Willpower book I mentioned in my podcast) from your "virtuous" act of skipping breakfast to indulge in unplanned, inter-meal "vice."

Reinhard

audiomama
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:45 am

Post by audiomama » Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:51 pm

I find that a small, late lunch sets me up well for a nice meal with my family. OR I sit with my family and have a small dinner. Two meals a day is not enough for me to sustain myself long-term.

But, as others have said, success lies in commitment and the planning more than the actual number of meals.

What I think DOESN'T work is changing the number of meals based on whether you're hungry or not. Part of the success of NoS is training one's body to expect food at regular intervals and not between.

Post Reply