variable schedule/ short and long days

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
erniep33
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 1:42 am

variable schedule/ short and long days

Post by erniep33 » Sun May 13, 2007 1:51 am

Hello everyone,

I've recently started the no S diet and so far I feel i'm doing pretty well. Although I do have a question.

I work the graveyard shift and my wife works the morning shift, so on my days off I switch to her shift.

This creates a very long day on Saturday for myself as I wake up early with my wife and then go to work and stay up all night. This can make a 20-22 hour day.

Luckily this is an S day, so if I sneak in an extra meal it won't weigh on me too heavily.

My question is what would you guys do if this was a non S day?

Would you try to stretch out the 3 meals or have a 4th meal?

User avatar
Jammin' Jan
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: The Village

Post by Jammin' Jan » Sun May 13, 2007 11:26 am

On my long work days, I pick an item from one meal and have it for a snack, then make sure I "deduct" that item from the meal. But my long days aren't nearly as long as yours. Since it's an S-Day anyway, I would probably go ahead and have another meal, at least a light one.

User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5958
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Post by reinhard » Tue May 15, 2007 12:53 am

Hi erniep33,

There are three ways to approach this, all with pros and cons

1. tough it out and stick with three meals. Pro: clearly "right" Con: may not be possible.

2. do some virtual plating as described by Jan. Pro: more humane Con: virtual plating can degenerate if you're not careful.

3. just give yourself an approved 4th meal. Pro: even more humane Con: that extra input opportunity is probably going to translate into more calories. That may be an acceptable trade off.

Unless you are the saintly/super heroic type, 2 or 3 are probably what you want to consider. There is no ideal solution here because it's not an ideal situation, but I think it is navigable.

Reinhard

erniep33
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 1:42 am

Post by erniep33 » Wed May 16, 2007 1:07 am

Thanks to both of you for the advice. I'll give em a try

Post Reply