Healthy vs. "Tasty"
Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating
-
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: Healthy vs. "Tasty"
It's true. Brian Wansink did a study on this at a kids' summer camp. When they gave the food more appealing names, the kids ate more of it, and said they liked it better, even though the food itself was not changed.
Geographic names are not mentioned in the article, but they're a good way to make food sound more appealing. How many times have you seen "Southwestern chicken," or something with a similar name, on a restaurant menu or frozen food box? How often do you see "polenta" in those contexts, and how often do you see "cornmeal mush"? The food marketing types know this stuff, and they know it makes a difference what you call a dish.
I kinda loved that there was a related article entitled, "I love you Mom, but you suck at cooking vegetables."
http://summertomato.com/i-love-you-mom- ... egetables/
http://summertomato.com/i-love-you-mom- ... egetables/
- ImprisonedBeauty
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:03 am
- Location: Central Pennsylvania
Nice! I also like The Sneaky Chef. If you still can't get them to eat it, hide it in their food. http://www.thesneakychef.com/
Taking it one small step at a time.
-
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:26 pm
Huh. I didn't know my sister had a food blog. The cooking she describes is so similar to what I suffered through as a kid, she must be my sister.Who Me? wrote:I kinda loved that there was a related article entitled, "I love you Mom, but you suck at cooking vegetables."
http://summertomato.com/i-love-you-mom- ... egetables/
When I was about five, I said i didn't like tapioca pudding. Yet, for some reason I started calling it Chicken ala King, and then I would eat it. Didn't matter that it had no chicken in it or that I had never tasted Chicken ala King! go figure.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23
There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)
Age 69
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
1/21-23
There is no S better than Vanilla No S (mods now as a senior citizen)
-
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:22 pm
- Location: England
Healthy and tasty should be, and can be, synonymous. Salt, Fat and Sugar: Why Eating Tasty Food Can Solve America's Food Problem.
I think the best way to make food tasty is to learn to cook it properly. It's not that difficult.
I think the best way to make food tasty is to learn to cook it properly. It's not that difficult.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
The blobs are tapioca pearls. They look weird, but they're great! They have a mildly sweet taste and pleasantly squishy texture (sort of like jell-o...but not really). When you get boba or bubble tea--that's what they call the drink with the pearls at the bottom--it's usually accompanied with an extra wide straw so you can slurp up the pearls as you drink. Yes, it sounds weird--but its REALLY good!
And in case you're wondering about tapioca, it's just a starchy root, sort of like a potato.
And in case you're wondering about tapioca, it's just a starchy root, sort of like a potato.
-
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:51 pm
oolala53 wrote:When I was about five, I said i didn't like tapioca pudding. Yet, for some reason I started calling it Chicken ala King, and then I would eat it. Didn't matter that it had no chicken in it or that I had never tasted Chicken ala King! go figure.
How funny I have never liked tapioca pudding either, those little "things" in it just make me kind gag.
Berry
-
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:26 pm
Know that the reason that corporate chefs (at chain restaurants and the makers of processed foods) don't do this is money, pure and simple. Putting more salt, fat, or sugar into food is often a cheaper way than cooking it properly to make it taste better. Or perhaps it allows it to be cooked by someone with less skill (who therefore doesn't get paid as much). You don't need to worry about profit margins when you cook for yourself or your family or friends.wosnes wrote:Healthy and tasty should be, and can be, synonymous. Salt, Fat and Sugar: Why Eating Tasty Food Can Solve America's Food Problem.
I think the best way to make food tasty is to learn to cook it properly. It's not that difficult.
Another reason for foods to have a lot of salt, fat, or sugar is prestige. If those ingredients are expensive, you can show off how rich you are by making food with a lot of them. Again, that's something you don't need to do.
A third reason might be a reaction to previous scarcity of fat, salt, or sugar, such as during wartime. I wonder if the popularity of processed foods and desserts in the US in the late twentieth century isn't a reaction to rationing during WWII. Most of us have seen firsthand the tendency to go crazy eating something if we are allowed to have it, or to have it in unlimited quantities, after a time of not being allowed to have it.
The high use of processed foods came well after WWII. I have some recipes of my mother's from the post-WWII era, and while they use processed foods, it's nothing like now.Nicest of the Damned wrote:Know that the reason that corporate chefs (at chain restaurants and the makers of processed foods) don't do this is money, pure and simple. Putting more salt, fat, or sugar into food is often a cheaper way than cooking it properly to make it taste better. Or perhaps it allows it to be cooked by someone with less skill (who therefore doesn't get paid as much). You don't need to worry about profit margins when you cook for yourself or your family or friends.wosnes wrote:Healthy and tasty should be, and can be, synonymous. Salt, Fat and Sugar: Why Eating Tasty Food Can Solve America's Food Problem.
I think the best way to make food tasty is to learn to cook it properly. It's not that difficult.
Another reason for foods to have a lot of salt, fat, or sugar is prestige. If those ingredients are expensive, you can show off how rich you are by making food with a lot of them. Again, that's something you don't need to do.
A third reason might be a reaction to previous scarcity of fat, salt, or sugar, such as during wartime. I wonder if the popularity of processed foods and desserts in the US in the late twentieth century isn't a reaction to rationing during WWII. Most of us have seen firsthand the tendency to go crazy eating something if we are allowed to have it, or to have it in unlimited quantities, after a time of not being allowed to have it.
Also, the article I linked to was more about not being afraid to use salt, fat, and sugar in home cooking -- not the use of these things in manufactured foods.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."
"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."